Localization of brand character for different cultures
What we fix and what we leave for local adaptation
It is useful to immediately divide the character into two layers — in analogy with how the localization of Tom and Jerry was done for the Singaporean audience: they preserved the core of the relationship "friendship through rivalry", but added Merlin, Asian instruments in the soundtrack, and durian as a detail of everyday life. The unified brand message remains unchanged, the local layer is formed on top of it — vocabulary, color codes, domestic scenes, secondary characters.
| Fixed elements | Flexible elements |
|---|---|
| Character name (or its transliteration according to clear rules) | Language, tone of speech, jokes, vocabulary |
| Key personality traits and motivation | Clothing styling, accessories |
| Values that the character conveys | Environment, background, domestic details of scenes |
| Trademark visual markers (eye shape, pose, silhouette) | Examples of products that the character advertises |
| Technical presets for reproduction: ID control, style transfer, facelock when working with AI video | Secondary characters, local references and holidays |
The last line is often omitted from briefs, but it is precisely this that saves the project from the situation when regional contractors draw 'almost the same character,' but with distorted proportions. A technical preset is not about aesthetics, it is about controlling reproducibility.
Soft rebranding versus complete image replacement
There are two working approaches, and the choice between them depends on the depth of the cultural conflict, not the budget.
The first approach is a soft rebranding: colors and logo remain the same, a local name and greeting are added. This is what the company Viva did in Armenia: in 2024 year, after separating from the MTS Group, the company rebranded, changing the slogan to "Around You" ("Around You you"), but preserved recognizability through a stable brand color and a redesigned logo. This path works when the conflict lies at the level of tonality, not symbolism.
The second approach is replacing the external appearance while preserving the cultural DNA. JD.com, upon entering Indonesia, replaced the mascot dog with a horse: the dog carried negative associations in the Muslim cultural context, and keeping it would have meant losing part of the audience from the start. However, brand features—eye shape, smile, pose—were transferred unchanged. Audience familiar with the original mascot in other markets still recognizes the "relative."
The difference between these approaches is fundamental: in the first case, communication is adapted, in the second, the visual carrier itself is changed. Confusing them is a mistake that either wastes the budget in vain (why change the appearance if the name alone would suffice), or, conversely, leaves an offensive detail where a full replacement was needed.
The process of testing before launching on a new market
Testing a character postfactum, after the campaign launch, is no longer testing but analyzing a scandal. The correct sequence looks like this:
- Cultural audit at the briefing stage: checking the character's name for negative associations and phonetic similarities in the local language.
- Checking the symbolism—colors, animals, gestures, poses—for religious and historical significance in a specific region.
- Focus group with local culture carriers, not only with translators: the translator sees the text, the carrier sees the context.
- Verification of background and supporting visual content — scenes, objects, locations where the character appears.
- Pilot launch to a limited audience with monitoring of reactions in the first 48–72 hours.
- Final approval through the brand-platform owner, not through the local marketing office alone.
The background point is often ignored, yet it is precisely there that the most expensive errors hide — the character may be impeccable, but the scene around him may not be.
Errors that are easier to prevent than to explain to the press service
| Error | Example | How to avoid |
|---|---|---|
| Inappropriate character appearance for the market | Campaign with the image of a European blonde for the Indian audience — conversion drops | Test the character's visual on a local focus group before production |
| Unverified background content | Stellar Blade — a random provocative detail in the background of the scene | A separate stage of review for the background and environment, independently from the character review itself |
| Lack of cultural research at the start of the design process | Assassin's Creed Shadows — destructible objects inside the functioning sanctuary | A cultural consultant is engaged at the concept stage, not post-production |
| Loss of cultural references during translation | Shrek — during localization into Russian, the percentage of preserved cultural references varies depending on the category (~60% success for puns to ~80% for humor and references) | Adapting jokes and references, not a direct translation; a separate writer for the local market |
All four cases are united by one thing: the problem was discovered by users, not the brand team. This is a sign that testing was formal or was not done at all.
Character Bible as a tool, not a formality
A character brandbook is not needed to simply look nice in Google Drive, but to ensure that each regional agency draws the same character, not "something similar." A working Character Bible records three blocks: immutable elements (name, traits, values, brand features), flexible variables (language, lexicon, styling, environment, product examples), and technical presets for reproduction — ID control, style transfer, facelock, if the character is generated or animated via AI tools.
It is important to specifically define the approval workflow: who on the local market has the right to propose adaptations, who at the global level approves the final version, and at what stage legal verification of the symbolism is included. Without this step, local offices either coordinate everything themselves (and risk the brand's reputation) or wait weeks for approval from the head office, losing launch speed.
Regional patterns that should be known in advance
In the Chinese market, mascots work through so-called "mo-culture" — cuteness, childishness, nostalgia. ButterBear has firmly established itself on the combination of cuteness, traditional costumes, and association with seasonal festivals with customized merch. For the Asian audience in general, anime elements are often added: large triple highlights in the eyes as a symbol of softness, volumetric "rubber" texture instead of flat illustration, and a change in the hero's lifestyle from rebellious to disciplined — for example, how they adapted the Malysharik character.
This is not a universal recipe for any market, but rather an illustration of the principle: character localization does not begin with repainting, but with understanding which archetype and which emotion are considered "theirs" in a specific culture. The Character Bible with a clear division into fixed and flexible blocks is the only way to manage this process systematically, rather than rely on the taste of a specific designer in a specific region.
| Fixed elements | Flexible elements |
|---|---|
| Character name (or its transliteration according to clear rules) | Language, tone of speech, jokes, vocabulary |
| Key personality traits and motivation | Clothing styling, accessories |
| Values that the character conveys | Environment, background, domestic details of scenes |
| Trademark visual markers (eye shape, pose, silhouette) | Examples of products that the character advertises |
| Technical presets for reproduction: ID control, style transfer, facelock when working with AI video | Secondary characters, local references and holidays |
The last line is often omitted from briefs, but it is precisely this that saves the project from the situation when regional contractors draw 'almost the same character,' but with distorted proportions. A technical preset is not about aesthetics, it is about controlling reproducibility.
Soft rebranding versus complete image replacement
There are two working approaches, and the choice between them depends on the depth of the cultural conflict, not the budget.
The first approach is a soft rebranding: colors and logo remain the same, a local name and greeting are added. This is what the company Viva did in Armenia: in 2024 year, after separating from the MTS Group, the company rebranded, changing the slogan to "Around You" ("Around You you"), but preserved recognizability through a stable brand color and a redesigned logo. This path works when the conflict lies at the level of tonality, not symbolism.
The second approach is replacing the external appearance while preserving the cultural DNA. JD.com, upon entering Indonesia, replaced the mascot dog with a horse: the dog carried negative associations in the Muslim cultural context, and keeping it would have meant losing part of the audience from the start. However, brand features—eye shape, smile, pose—were transferred unchanged. Audience familiar with the original mascot in other markets still recognizes the "relative."
The difference between these approaches is fundamental: in the first case, communication is adapted, in the second, the visual carrier itself is changed. Confusing them is a mistake that either wastes the budget in vain (why change the appearance if the name alone would suffice), or, conversely, leaves an offensive detail where a full replacement was needed.
The process of testing before launching on a new market
Testing a character postfactum, after the campaign launch, is no longer testing but analyzing a scandal. The correct sequence looks like this:
- Cultural audit at the briefing stage: checking the character's name for negative associations and phonetic similarities in the local language.
- Checking the symbolism—colors, animals, gestures, poses—for religious and historical significance in a specific region.
- Focus group with local culture carriers, not only with translators: the translator sees the text, the carrier sees the context.
- Verification of background and supporting visual content — scenes, objects, locations where the character appears.
- Pilot launch to a limited audience with monitoring of reactions in the first 48–72 hours.
- Final approval through the brand-platform owner, not through the local marketing office alone.
The background point is often ignored, yet it is precisely there that the most expensive errors hide — the character may be impeccable, but the scene around him may not be.
Errors that are easier to prevent than to explain to the press service
| Error | Example | How to avoid |
|---|---|---|
| Inappropriate character appearance for the market | Campaign with the image of a European blonde for the Indian audience — conversion drops | Test the character's visual on a local focus group before production |
| Unverified background content | Stellar Blade — a random provocative detail in the background of the scene | A separate stage of review for the background and environment, independently from the character review itself |
| Lack of cultural research at the start of the design process | Assassin's Creed Shadows — destructible objects inside the functioning sanctuary | A cultural consultant is engaged at the concept stage, not post-production |
| Loss of cultural references during translation | Shrek — during localization into Russian, the percentage of preserved cultural references varies depending on the category (~60% success for puns to ~80% for humor and references) | Adapting jokes and references, not a direct translation; a separate writer for the local market |
All four cases are united by one thing: the problem was discovered by users, not the brand team. This is a sign that testing was formal or was not done at all.
Character Bible as a tool, not a formality
A character brandbook is not needed to simply look nice in Google Drive, but to ensure that each regional agency draws the same character, not "something similar." A working Character Bible records three blocks: immutable elements (name, traits, values, brand features), flexible variables (language, lexicon, styling, environment, product examples), and technical presets for reproduction — ID control, style transfer, facelock, if the character is generated or animated via AI tools.
It is important to specifically define the approval workflow: who on the local market has the right to propose adaptations, who at the global level approves the final version, and at what stage legal verification of the symbolism is included. Without this step, local offices either coordinate everything themselves (and risk the brand's reputation) or wait weeks for approval from the head office, losing launch speed.
Regional patterns that should be known in advance
In the Chinese market, mascots work through so-called "mo-culture" — cuteness, childishness, nostalgia. ButterBear has firmly established itself on the combination of cuteness, traditional costumes, and association with seasonal festivals with customized merch. For the Asian audience in general, anime elements are often added: large triple highlights in the eyes as a symbol of softness, volumetric "rubber" texture instead of flat illustration, and a change in the hero's lifestyle from rebellious to disciplined — for example, how they adapted the Malysharik character.
This is not a universal recipe for any market, but rather an illustration of the principle: character localization does not begin with repainting, but with understanding which archetype and which emotion are considered "theirs" in a specific culture. The Character Bible with a clear division into fixed and flexible blocks is the only way to manage this process systematically, rather than rely on the taste of a specific designer in a specific region.
Recent articles
MegaFon, BMW, VTB and more 240+ companies. See how it looks in the showcase reel:
Our branding agency is approached to order:
Branding agency services
