Multilingual brandbook: how to avoid distortions of meaning
Translation and transliteration — different operations with different outcomes
Translation preserves meaning. Transliteration preserves effect — and for that reason may completely replace words. A slogan is not a fact to be conveyed, but an emotional construction; when literally transferred, the construction usually breaks together with the meaning.
HSBC slogan «Assume Nothing» was read on several markets as «Do Nothing». The rebranding due to this error cost the bank approximately 10 million dollars. The problem is not in the translator's knowledge of the language — the phrase was sent for translation, not transliteration, and no one tested the emotional effect on the target audience before launch. This is a key difference between the processes: translation is checked for accuracy, transliteration — for reaction.
Three documents instead of one PDF
A single file with the logo and palette for all countries — a typical mistake of companies that scale faster than they establish processes. A working system consists of three documents, and one cannot be substituted for another.
| Document | What is being recorded | Who uses it |
|---|---|---|
| Multilingual style guide | Unchanging values, brand voice characteristics, taboo topics for all markets | Global brand team |
| Language-specific guide | Formality of address, phrase length, allowance of humor, date and number formats for a specific language | Local marketing and copywriters |
| Termbase (glossary) | Approved translations of brand, product, and functional terms for each locale | Translators and editors |
Without a termbase, there is variation in terminology — and this is not a matter of style, but direct costs due to the need to rework texts when the same product is named differently in various materials.
What must be in the localization guide
- Tone of voice with examples of 'such — not such' for each language, not general descriptions of character.
- Approved glossary: brand terms, product terms, functional terms.
- Cultural notes for each market in a separate block, with specific prohibitions and allowances.
- Date formats, currency, number separators.
- Language variants within one language — British English versus American English, Brazilian Portuguese versus Portuguese.
- Metadata for management: document owner, update frequency, who is the arbiter in a dispute between the global team and the local market.
Symbols are read differently — and the brandbook must name this directly
Color, form of address, and humor — not a universal language. If the brandbook does not explicitly fix local values of symbols, the local team either guesses or blindly copies the original.
| Element | Meaning in a Western context | Risk on other markets |
|---|---|---|
| White color | Purity, minimalism | Mourning in China, India, Japan |
| Red color | Energy, passion | Luck and money in China; mourning in South Africa |
| Green color | Ecology, growth | Sacred color in Islamic countries, requires respectful application |
| Formality of address | Often neutral in English | In German, French, Spanish there is tu/vous — the choice of form is determined by whether the brand sounds respectful or casual |
| Humor and idioms | Work within the original culture | Literally do not translate — source of 'leakage of global English' and falsity in text |
Literalness costs more than transliteration: three illustrative cases
KFC, upon entering the Chinese market, translated 'Finger-Lickin' Good' almost literally — the phrase was read as 'Eat your fingers'.
Snickers on the CIS market initially translated the positioning literally — 'satiating bar'. The audience did not believe that the bar replaced a meal, the message did not work. The solution was not found in translation, but in reassembly of emotion: the slogan 'Don't slow down, snicker your way!' shifted the focus to speed and energy instead of satiety — and sales increased. The difference between these three cases is simple: the first two lost money on literalness, the third earned money on refusal of it.
Five filters through which localized text must pass
Grammatical correctness is a minimum threshold, not an approval criterion. AI translators produce flawless grammar text without cultural judgment, and when scaled to hundreds of materials, this becomes a systemic error: everything passes grammar check, nothing — check for appropriateness. Therefore, we build in five separate filters into the process.
- Accuracy — meaning is conveyed without distortions or losses.
- Voice fit — the text sounds like a brand in this language, not like a neutral footnote.
- Terminology consistency — terms from the approved terminology base are used, not synonyms by the translator's taste.
- Cultural fit — idioms, humor, and references are appropriate for the local audience.
- Platform fit — the tone in social networks and the tone in customer support — are not the same text with replaced words.
The fifth filter is not automated: it requires a language speaker with the authority to reject text not for grammar, but for the feeling of 'it doesn't sound right.' Without such a person in the process, AI translation does not save, but masks the problem under the appearance of a finished result.
What the brand has no right to change locally
The main managerial question of a multilingual brandbook is not 'how to translate,' but 'what is fixed firmly, and what can be adapted.' Without this distinction, any dispute with the local market turns into an endless discussion of tastes, because there is no criterion for who is right.
| Core brand — unchanged everywhere | Local adaptation — can be changed |
|---|---|
| Brand mission and values | Voice tone formulations for a specific language |
| Logo and its proportions | Examples, metaphors, cultural references |
| The main color palette as a system | Slogans and tactical campaign messages |
| Brand architecture and positioning at the level of idea | Visual accents that do not contradict the core palette |
| Key product terms (meaning, not sound) | The exact sound of the term within the framework of the agreed glossary |
Companies that do not explicitly draw this boundary and hand over the brandbook for translation as a single untouchable document receive one of two problems: either the brand spreads across markets to the point of unrecognizability, or the translator fears to touch even a single word in the text that looks like a holy relic rather than a working tool — and as a result gets a failed slogan such as HSBC, simply because nobody had the right to rewrite it.
Translation and transliteration — different operations with different outcomes
Translation preserves meaning. Transliteration preserves effect — and for that reason may completely replace words. A slogan is not a fact to be conveyed, but an emotional construction; when literally transferred, the construction usually breaks together with the meaning.
HSBC slogan «Assume Nothing» was read on several markets as «Do Nothing». The rebranding due to this error cost the bank approximately 10 million dollars. The problem is not in the translator's knowledge of the language — the phrase was sent for translation, not transliteration, and no one tested the emotional effect on the target audience before launch. This is a key difference between the processes: translation is checked for accuracy, transliteration — for reaction.
Three documents instead of one PDF
A single file with the logo and palette for all countries — a typical mistake of companies that scale faster than they establish processes. A working system consists of three documents, and one cannot be substituted for another.
| Document | What is being recorded | Who uses it |
|---|---|---|
| Multilingual style guide | Unchanging values, brand voice characteristics, taboo topics for all markets | Global brand team |
| Language-specific guide | Formality of address, phrase length, allowance of humor, date and number formats for a specific language | Local marketing and copywriters |
| Termbase (glossary) | Approved translations of brand, product, and functional terms for each locale | Translators and editors |
Without a termbase, there is variation in terminology — and this is not a matter of style, but direct costs due to the need to rework texts when the same product is named differently in various materials.
What must be in the localization guide
- Tone of voice with examples of 'such — not such' for each language, not general descriptions of character.
- Approved glossary: brand terms, product terms, functional terms.
- Cultural notes for each market in a separate block, with specific prohibitions and allowances.
- Date formats, currency, number separators.
- Language variants within one language — British English versus American English, Brazilian Portuguese versus Portuguese.
- Metadata for management: document owner, update frequency, who is the arbiter in a dispute between the global team and the local market.
Symbols are read differently — and the brandbook must name this directly
Color, form of address, and humor — not a universal language. If the brandbook does not explicitly fix local values of symbols, the local team either guesses or blindly copies the original.
| Element | Meaning in a Western context | Risk on other markets |
|---|---|---|
| White color | Purity, minimalism | Mourning in China, India, Japan |
| Red color | Energy, passion | Luck and money in China; mourning in South Africa |
| Green color | Ecology, growth | Sacred color in Islamic countries, requires respectful application |
| Formality of address | Often neutral in English | In German, French, Spanish there is tu/vous — the choice of form is determined by whether the brand sounds respectful or casual |
| Humor and idioms | Work within the original culture | Literally do not translate — source of 'leakage of global English' and falsity in text |
Literalness costs more than transliteration: three illustrative cases
KFC, upon entering the Chinese market, translated 'Finger-Lickin' Good' almost literally — the phrase was read as 'Eat your fingers'.
Snickers on the CIS market initially translated the positioning literally — 'satiating bar'. The audience did not believe that the bar replaced a meal, the message did not work. The solution was not found in translation, but in reassembly of emotion: the slogan 'Don't slow down, snicker your way!' shifted the focus to speed and energy instead of satiety — and sales increased. The difference between these three cases is simple: the first two lost money on literalness, the third earned money on refusal of it.
Five filters through which localized text must pass
Grammatical correctness is a minimum threshold, not an approval criterion. AI translators produce flawless grammar text without cultural judgment, and when scaled to hundreds of materials, this becomes a systemic error: everything passes grammar check, nothing — check for appropriateness. Therefore, we build in five separate filters into the process.
- Accuracy — meaning is conveyed without distortions or losses.
- Voice fit — the text sounds like a brand in this language, not like a neutral footnote.
- Terminology consistency — terms from the approved terminology base are used, not synonyms by the translator's taste.
- Cultural fit — idioms, humor, and references are appropriate for the local audience.
- Platform fit — the tone in social networks and the tone in customer support — are not the same text with replaced words.
The fifth filter is not automated: it requires a language speaker with the authority to reject text not for grammar, but for the feeling of 'it doesn't sound right.' Without such a person in the process, AI translation does not save, but masks the problem under the appearance of a finished result.
What the brand has no right to change locally
The main managerial question of a multilingual brandbook is not 'how to translate,' but 'what is fixed firmly, and what can be adapted.' Without this distinction, any dispute with the local market turns into an endless discussion of tastes, because there is no criterion for who is right.
| Core brand — unchanged everywhere | Local adaptation — can be changed |
|---|---|
| Brand mission and values | Voice tone formulations for a specific language |
| Logo and its proportions | Examples, metaphors, cultural references |
| The main color palette as a system | Slogans and tactical campaign messages |
| Brand architecture and positioning at the level of idea | Visual accents that do not contradict the core palette |
| Key product terms (meaning, not sound) | The exact sound of the term within the framework of the agreed glossary |
Companies that do not explicitly draw this boundary and hand over the brandbook for translation as a single untouchable document receive one of two problems: either the brand spreads across markets to the point of unrecognizability, or the translator fears to touch even a single word in the text that looks like a holy relic rather than a working tool — and as a result gets a failed slogan such as HSBC, simply because nobody had the right to rewrite it.
Recent articles
MegaFon, BMW, VTB and more 240+ companies. See how it looks in the showcase reel:
Our branding agency is approached to order:
Branding agency services
