Branding and copyright in the digital environment
Confusion arises because in everyday language "protecting a brand" sounds like one task. In practice, it is a set of several independent mechanisms, each of which closes its own gap. Let's examine them not in order of importance, but through comparison — that way it's clearer where one tool ends and the next begins.
Copyright and trademark: two different shields
Copyright arises automatically at the moment of creation of the work — a drawing, text, website design. No registration is required, protection lasts for the lifetime of the author plus 70 years. A trademark is a completely different construct: the right does not arise by itself, it must be registered with Rospatent, it is limited to specific classes of the Nice Classification (for example, class 35 — advertising, class 42 — IT services) and the territory of the country where the registration was made.
| Criterion | Copyright | Trademark |
|---|---|---|
| Moment of creation | Automatically upon creation | Only after registration |
| What It Protects | A specific form — a file, image, code | A designation as an identifier of a product/service in certain classes |
| Protection period | Life of the author + 70 years | 10 years with indefinite renewal |
| Territory | International (Berne Convention) | Country of registration or region (EAEU, EU) |
| What to do in case of infringement | Prove authorship and the fact of copying | Submit a certificate — almost nothing needs to be proven |
The mistake of most startups is to rely only on copyright, because it is 'free.' It is much harder to prove in court that you, and not your competitor, were the first to draw up the logo, than to present a trademark registration certificate with a priority date. Therefore, the logo, slogan, and brand name must be registered as a trademark separately from the fact of their publication anywhere on the Internet.
Where to register: national procedure, EAEU, or international system
The second question that almost always follows the first one is: "Should I register only in Russia or everywhere at once?" The answer depends on where the brand really sells and where it plans to grow within the 2–3 year horizon.
- Rospatent — if the business operates only on the Russian market. The procedure takes 8–12 months, and fees are significantly lower than international ones.
- Eurasian system (EAPO) — if the plan is to enter EAEU countries (Kazakhstan, Belarus, Armenia) with one application.
- Madrid system (WIPO) — if the brand is digital by nature and the audience is not tied to one country: a SaaS product, a mobile app, an info-product with an English version.
A common misconception is that "since the website is accessible worldwide, the trademark protects the brand everywhere." That is not true: protection is territorial. If a brand is not registered in a specific country, someone else can legally register it there, including unscrupulous local distributors who may then sell you the right to use your own name.
Logo generated by a neural network: who owns the rights
A separate headache of the last two years has been logos and visuals generated by Midjourney, DALL·E, or similar tools. The position of Russian and most foreign legal systems coincides on this: an object created without human creative input is not protected by copyright. Formally, this means that a logo generated by a neural network can be used by anyone — including direct competitors, if they find an identical generation result or a similar prompt.
The practical conclusion is simple and harsh: the result of generation needs to be manually refined — changing proportions, color, adding authorial elements — and documenting this process (history files, screencasts, intermediate versions). It is precisely the human-edited version that becomes an object of copyright and can be submitted for registration as a trademark. Using the raw generation result as the sole visual brand asset is a risky economy.
Domain, social networks, NFT: where legal protection ends and technical control begins
A domain, a social media account, and an NFT token with a brand logo are often perceived as 'digital property,' but legally these are three different constructions with varying strength.
| Asset | What it provides | A weak point |
|---|---|---|
| Domain | Priority registration, right to use the address | Does not grant rights to the name as such — cyber squatting can register a similar domain in another zone |
| Social media account | Verification, accumulated audience | Fully depends on the platform's policy, may be blocked or revoked without court |
| NFT with the logo | Proof of file existence on a specific date (blockchain timestamp) | Does not create copyright by itself — it is merely a record of fact, not a legal title |
NFTs are sometimes sold as 'protection against brand counterfeits' — this is an exaggeration. The blockchain records the existence of a specific file at a specific moment, which is convenient as evidence in a priority dispute, but does not replace trademark registration and does not grant the exclusive right to prohibit others from using a similar designation.
Detected a copy of the brand: complaint, DMCA or court
When the fact of copying has already occurred, the choice of tool depends on the platform and the jurisdiction of the infringer.
- Pre-litigation complaint from the rights holder. Works quickly within one country, if the infringer has public contacts and business reputation that they are not willing to risk in court.
- DMCA takedown. Effective against hosting providers, marketplaces and platforms registered in the USA or oriented toward an international audience — YouTube, Shopify, Amazon remove content based on a complaint within 24–72 hours without court.
- Appeal to the domain administrator or registrar (UDRP). Applied when a similar domain name is seized — an alternative dispute resolution procedure is faster and cheaper than court.
- Legal proceeding. It is necessary if the infringer operates in the same jurisdiction, refuses to respond to a cease and desist letter, and the matter involves substantial commercial damage.
Filing immediately with the court is a typical mistake: it is time-consuming and expensive, whereas most disputes in the digital environment are resolved at the platform level within a few days, provided the complaint is properly filed and there is a verified right (a trademark registration certificate significantly accelerates the consideration of such a complaint).
The minimum set of protections for a digital brand
Full-fledged protection is not composed of a single action, but rather from a combination of measures that simultaneously address different risks.
- Registration of a trademark in classes that are actually relevant to the product — not 'just in case, in all 45 classes,' but meaningfully.
- Fixing authorship of visual materials: storing original files, history of edits, creation dates.
- Registering a domain in all significant brand zones (.ru, .com, local market zones of presence), not only the main one.
- Verification of key social media accounts and monitoring of similar names.
- A contract with a designer or agency with explicit transfer of exclusive rights — an informal agreement like 'the logo is ours' without a clause on rights transfer means nothing legally.
It's not necessary to gather everything at once — but building protection should follow this order: first, fixing rights to the assets themselves, then territorial coverage, then monitoring and readiness to quickly respond to copying.
Confusion arises because in everyday language "protecting a brand" sounds like one task. In practice, it is a set of several independent mechanisms, each of which closes its own gap. Let's examine them not in order of importance, but through comparison — that way it's clearer where one tool ends and the next begins.
Copyright and trademark: two different shields
Copyright arises automatically at the moment of creation of the work — a drawing, text, website design. No registration is required, protection lasts for the lifetime of the author plus 70 years. A trademark is a completely different construct: the right does not arise by itself, it must be registered with Rospatent, it is limited to specific classes of the Nice Classification (for example, class 35 — advertising, class 42 — IT services) and the territory of the country where the registration was made.
| Criterion | Copyright | Trademark |
|---|---|---|
| Moment of creation | Automatically upon creation | Only after registration |
| What It Protects | A specific form — a file, image, code | A designation as an identifier of a product/service in certain classes |
| Protection period | Life of the author + 70 years | 10 years with indefinite renewal |
| Territory | International (Berne Convention) | Country of registration or region (EAEU, EU) |
| What to do in case of infringement | Prove authorship and the fact of copying | Submit a certificate — almost nothing needs to be proven |
The mistake of most startups is to rely only on copyright, because it is 'free.' It is much harder to prove in court that you, and not your competitor, were the first to draw up the logo, than to present a trademark registration certificate with a priority date. Therefore, the logo, slogan, and brand name must be registered as a trademark separately from the fact of their publication anywhere on the Internet.
Where to register: national procedure, EAEU, or international system
The second question that almost always follows the first one is: "Should I register only in Russia or everywhere at once?" The answer depends on where the brand really sells and where it plans to grow within the 2–3 year horizon.
- Rospatent — if the business operates only on the Russian market. The procedure takes 8–12 months, and fees are significantly lower than international ones.
- Eurasian system (EAPO) — if the plan is to enter EAEU countries (Kazakhstan, Belarus, Armenia) with one application.
- Madrid system (WIPO) — if the brand is digital by nature and the audience is not tied to one country: a SaaS product, a mobile app, an info-product with an English version.
A common misconception is that "since the website is accessible worldwide, the trademark protects the brand everywhere." That is not true: protection is territorial. If a brand is not registered in a specific country, someone else can legally register it there, including unscrupulous local distributors who may then sell you the right to use your own name.
Logo generated by a neural network: who owns the rights
A separate headache of the last two years has been logos and visuals generated by Midjourney, DALL·E, or similar tools. The position of Russian and most foreign legal systems coincides on this: an object created without human creative input is not protected by copyright. Formally, this means that a logo generated by a neural network can be used by anyone — including direct competitors, if they find an identical generation result or a similar prompt.
The practical conclusion is simple and harsh: the result of generation needs to be manually refined — changing proportions, color, adding authorial elements — and documenting this process (history files, screencasts, intermediate versions). It is precisely the human-edited version that becomes an object of copyright and can be submitted for registration as a trademark. Using the raw generation result as the sole visual brand asset is a risky economy.
Domain, social networks, NFT: where legal protection ends and technical control begins
A domain, a social media account, and an NFT token with a brand logo are often perceived as 'digital property,' but legally these are three different constructions with varying strength.
| Asset | What it provides | A weak point |
|---|---|---|
| Domain | Priority registration, right to use the address | Does not grant rights to the name as such — cyber squatting can register a similar domain in another zone |
| Social media account | Verification, accumulated audience | Fully depends on the platform's policy, may be blocked or revoked without court |
| NFT with the logo | Proof of file existence on a specific date (blockchain timestamp) | Does not create copyright by itself — it is merely a record of fact, not a legal title |
NFTs are sometimes sold as 'protection against brand counterfeits' — this is an exaggeration. The blockchain records the existence of a specific file at a specific moment, which is convenient as evidence in a priority dispute, but does not replace trademark registration and does not grant the exclusive right to prohibit others from using a similar designation.
Detected a copy of the brand: complaint, DMCA or court
When the fact of copying has already occurred, the choice of tool depends on the platform and the jurisdiction of the infringer.
- Pre-litigation complaint from the rights holder. Works quickly within one country, if the infringer has public contacts and business reputation that they are not willing to risk in court.
- DMCA takedown. Effective against hosting providers, marketplaces and platforms registered in the USA or oriented toward an international audience — YouTube, Shopify, Amazon remove content based on a complaint within 24–72 hours without court.
- Appeal to the domain administrator or registrar (UDRP). Applied when a similar domain name is seized — an alternative dispute resolution procedure is faster and cheaper than court.
- Legal proceeding. It is necessary if the infringer operates in the same jurisdiction, refuses to respond to a cease and desist letter, and the matter involves substantial commercial damage.
Filing immediately with the court is a typical mistake: it is time-consuming and expensive, whereas most disputes in the digital environment are resolved at the platform level within a few days, provided the complaint is properly filed and there is a verified right (a trademark registration certificate significantly accelerates the consideration of such a complaint).
The minimum set of protections for a digital brand
Full-fledged protection is not composed of a single action, but rather from a combination of measures that simultaneously address different risks.
- Registration of a trademark in classes that are actually relevant to the product — not 'just in case, in all 45 classes,' but meaningfully.
- Fixing authorship of visual materials: storing original files, history of edits, creation dates.
- Registering a domain in all significant brand zones (.ru, .com, local market zones of presence), not only the main one.
- Verification of key social media accounts and monitoring of similar names.
- A contract with a designer or agency with explicit transfer of exclusive rights — an informal agreement like 'the logo is ours' without a clause on rights transfer means nothing legally.
It's not necessary to gather everything at once — but building protection should follow this order: first, fixing rights to the assets themselves, then territorial coverage, then monitoring and readiness to quickly respond to copying.
Recent articles
MegaFon, BMW, VTB and more 240+ companies. See how it looks in the showcase reel:
Our branding agency is approached to order:
Branding agency services
