Price is determined by dozens of factors: scarcity, logistics, taxes, sales channels, temporary hype. Price premium is the part of the price that the buyer pays above the 'fair' value specifically for the brand strength. Distinguishing one from the other is only possible through comparison with a quality benchmark.
| Indicator | Simply high price | True price premium |
|---|---|---|
| Source | Scarcity, monopoly on the channel, one-time promotion | Perception of quality and emotional attachment |
| Durability | Declines upon introduction of alternatives | Remains even upon introduction of cheap analogs |
| Connection with the product | Often the price is higher than objective quality | The price corresponds to or is below the perceived quality, but above the 'reference' price of the category |
| How to check | Comparison with the category's reference price | Comparison with the price predicted by quality (quality-predicted price) |
If the brand's price is higher than what perceived quality predicts, this is not a brand premium, but overvaluation, which the market will eventually correct through a decline in market share or competitive dumping. If the price is below quality — the brand simply is not capturing the revenue it could without changing the product.
The classic Kantar formula requires data on revenue share and unit share: Price Premium = (Revenue Share / Unit Share) × 100. For example, with 25% revenue and 20% volume, the premium equals 1.25, that is 25%. Small and medium businesses usually do not have access to such data — they have to choose one of four benchmarks.
| Benchmark | When to use |
|---|---|
| The price of a specific competitor | There is one clear category benchmark (leader or direct analog) |
| Weighted average price of the category | There are data on sales volumes of different players |
| Unweighted average price | No data on volumes, only price lists available |
| Display-weighted price | Retail manages shelf placement — the price of products on the shelf is important, not the price in the catalog |
Without volume data, a simplified formula is used: CP = (Brand Price − Reference Price) / Reference Price × 100. There is no universal 'normal level' for all categories: in FMCG, a noticeable premium starts from 10–15%, whereas in categories with high emotional engagement — cosmetics, coffee, alcohol — a healthy range is considered to be 20–40%.
A study of 6500+ brands in 200+ FMCG categories showed that only one-fifth of market players actually command a price premium, while the rest 80% sell at zero relative to the category. The reason is not marketers' greed, but lack of differentiation: without it, buyers do not see why they should pay more and choose by price.
At the same time, even price-sensitive buyers are willing to pay more when there is clear differentiation — 14% showed a Kantar study in yogurt and cat food categories. Brand-oriented buyers in the same categories are willing to pay 38% more. The difference is huge, and it explains why averaged figures like 'the market is ready to pay X%' are meaningless without audience segmentation.
Say-do gap — a persistent issue in WTP research: people declare one willingness to pay in surveys, but behave differently in reality. Three approaches provide varying degrees of accuracy.
For small businesses, a reasonable compromise is price testing on a portion of sales channels, for example, different prices on a marketplace and in your own online store, followed by comparison of conversion rates and volume.
You can raise prices without a strong brand—just by taking advantage of the moment. But such a jump usually hits sales volume proportionally to the elasticity of demand. The difference between a one-time price increase and building a premium lies in how brand investments change the elasticity itself.
Example from Kantar/Google practice: for a cosmetic brand, brand-building investments reduced price elasticity from −0,7 to −0,6. When price was increased by 14%, expected demand decline was around 10%, but due to lower elasticity revenue grew by 7% instead of falling. This is the difference between 'raise prices' and 'build a premium': in the latter case, the market tolerates the increase because perceived value rises along with it.
76% additional revenue from increased pricing power came precisely from marketing investments, not product improvements—this fact is often ignored by finance-oriented brand evaluation models. The product can stay the same, and the premium grows due to perception.
Large reports by Kantar BrandZ and Interbrand are built on panel data unavailable to small companies. However, tracking the dynamics of your own premium is possible without them — the methodology is simpler, the accuracy is lower, but the trend is visible.
This approach will not replace panel data from large agencies, but it provides sufficient accuracy to make decisions about raising prices not at random, but based on your own sales history.
Price premium is not a one-time bonus for a successful rebranding or a result of attractive packaging, but a measurable outcome of accumulated decisions: quality, differentiation, and emotional connection with the audience. It is calculated through comparison with a category benchmark, grows through specific steps, and is tested on small scales before being launched on the entire market. Companies that track it once a quarter and treat it as a metric, not a feeling, receive the pre