Video game identity as a product: from cover to in-game UI
The logo dictates the shape of buttons — or should dictate
The connection between the logo and the in-game interface is direct, but it works not through copying the icon, but through transferring its geometric and color solutions to the level of UI elements. If the logo is built on sharp angles and diagonals — health panels, item icons, and window frames should inherit the same logic, not turn into soft rounded rectangles 'for convenience'.
A vivid example is the AR project of the Freelance.ru studio, where a logo with an eye in a triangle set a hexagonal geometry for the entire interface: hexagons from the symbol became the basis for buttons, panels, and the player status color-coding system. This is not a decorative coincidence, but an engineering solution — one visual module scales from the icon to the screen grid. When such a transfer is not made, the user feels that the logo and the interface belong to different products, even if formally it is the same title.
Why the conflict between the cover and UI undermines trust in the product
Cover is the promise of aesthetics, and UI is its fulfillment. The player buys a game based on the visual tone of the box art: a dark palette, brutal typography, a specific composition. If after launch he sees menus from a template game engine with default fonts — the promise is unfulfilled, and this is felt as deception, even if the game mechanics are excellent.
In Insomniac Games, there is a simple rule for creating covers: simplicity and brightness work better than an abundance of details. This works not only on the store shelf — the same principle determines the readability of the interface on screens of various sizes, from 4K monitor to Nintendo Switch in docking mode. A cover overloaded with details requires the same density from the UI to avoid looking deceptive — and a dense interface almost always loses in terms of convenience. Therefore, the decision on visual complexity is made at the level of the game brand as a whole, not separately for each screen.
Case: how PlayStation Studios assembled Horizon into a unified font system
PlayStation Studios Creative Team approached the task systematically and developed not one, but two official typefaces for Horizon. Machine Nova is responsible for the logo itself and its scaling on covers, posters, and promotional materials — this is a static, recognizable brand mark. Hunter Nova is used in the UI and all supporting text within the game — in tooltips, item descriptions, and dialogues.
Separating tasks between two fonts is the very mechanism for synchronizing identity across different layers of the product. The logo does not have to be easily readable in a small type size on an inventory panel, and the interface text does not have to carry the entire brand dramaturgy. But both typefaces are cut from the same stylistic DNA — sharp notches, mechanical rigidity of forms — so even without a common letterform they are perceived as parts of a single system. A similar principle, but implemented through material rather than font, is realized in Anno: the logo-letter 'A' is physically manufactured by craftsman Owen Phillips from real metal within the concept of 'Crafted with Care', and then this information about materiality — the texture of metal, traces of forging — is transferred into the digital design of the interface and construction elements.
How large studios build a system over product layers
Different studios have different logics for building identity, but the principle is the same: some elements are fixed as brand constants, while others remain flexible for seasonal updates and marketing campaigns.
| Studio / project | What is fixed (constant) | What changes (variable) |
|---|---|---|
| PlayStation Studios — Horizon | Typefaces Machine Nova and Hunter Nova, mechanical geometry of forms | Color themes by season, composition of key arts |
| Ubisoft — Anno | Forged letter 'A', material texture, artisanal aesthetics | Historical era and palette for a specific part of the series |
| Bungie / Kurpa Khosk — Marathon | Core brand identity of the game and overall typography | Individual faction brands with their own visual identity |
| Respawn — Apex Legends Mobile | Logo, basic color system, silhouettes of UI icons | Seasonal visual themes every 6 weeks |
| Mojang — Minecraft | Grid 16×16 pixels for all graphic elements | Thematic sets of textures and skins |
Marathon from Bungie and Kurpa Khosk deserves a separate mention: for the warring factions, full sub-brands were developed that work simultaneously within the game, in social networks, on a Discord server with 400 thousand participants, and at offline pop-up events. This is no longer just a UI system, but a brand architecture — several identities within one game, synchronized by common layout and color-coding rules, but with different character.
Apex Legends Mobile describes its model metaphorically as 'a rubber band, not a mountain': the brand should stretch to accommodate seasonal updates, but not tear or lose recognizability. Some elements — the logo, silhouettes of character icons — are firmly fixed. Others — color accents, background patterns — change every six weeks along with the new content.
Where the unified identity usually breaks down
In practice, the breakdown of the system occurs not due to a lack of talent among designers, but due to organizational gaps in production. The most common failures are:
- Marketing team and UI team work with different brandbooks or even without a single document — the cover logo exists separately from the interface guideline.
- The typography of the cover is taken without adaptation: the complex decorative logo font does not scale well on small screens of Steam Deck or mobile devices, and as a result, a completely different, more 'safe' font appears in the UI.
- The color palette of the key art is not transferred to the UI kit — the interface is built using default colors of the engine or the component library.
- Seasonal updates change too many brand constants at once, causing the game to lose recognizability from patch to patch.
- The geometry of logo forms (angles, roundings, proportions) is not documented as a rule for icons and buttons, and each UI designer interprets the style in their own way.
How to maintain the system as a whole, not a set of parts
The unified identity of a video game is built from top to bottom: first, the geometry, palette, and typography principles are fixed at the logo level, then these decisions are translated into a style guide for UI, and only after that the cover composition is checked for compliance with what the player will see inside.
- To fix the geometric language of the logo — angles, curves, proportions — which is usually applicable to icons and buttons.
- To separate typography into 'image-based' (for cover and logo) and 'functional' (for UI), as was done with Machine Nova and Hunter Nova in Horizon.
- To prepare simplified versions of the logo and font for small screens in advance, rather than afterward, when the game is already released on Steam Deck.
- To define brand constants that never change and variables that allow seasonal updates — following the model of 'rubber, not mountain'.
- To test the cover composition for UI tone alignment before release, rather than relying on the assumption that players will 'understand the difference between marketing and product'.
Consistency of form, color, and spacing in the interface directly affects how the player reads the hierarchy of actions — attack, defense, purchase, upgrade. If this consistency is broken at the boundary between the cover and the first menu screen, the player loses orientation even before beginning to understand the mechanics. The game's identity works only as a system — where the logo, cover, and interface speak the same visual language at different volumes.
The logo dictates the shape of buttons — or should dictate
The connection between the logo and the in-game interface is direct, but it works not through copying the icon, but through transferring its geometric and color solutions to the level of UI elements. If the logo is built on sharp angles and diagonals — health panels, item icons, and window frames should inherit the same logic, not turn into soft rounded rectangles 'for convenience'.
A vivid example is the AR project of the Freelance.ru studio, where a logo with an eye in a triangle set a hexagonal geometry for the entire interface: hexagons from the symbol became the basis for buttons, panels, and the player status color-coding system. This is not a decorative coincidence, but an engineering solution — one visual module scales from the icon to the screen grid. When such a transfer is not made, the user feels that the logo and the interface belong to different products, even if formally it is the same title.
Why the conflict between the cover and UI undermines trust in the product
Cover is the promise of aesthetics, and UI is its fulfillment. The player buys a game based on the visual tone of the box art: a dark palette, brutal typography, a specific composition. If after launch he sees menus from a template game engine with default fonts — the promise is unfulfilled, and this is felt as deception, even if the game mechanics are excellent.
In Insomniac Games, there is a simple rule for creating covers: simplicity and brightness work better than an abundance of details. This works not only on the store shelf — the same principle determines the readability of the interface on screens of various sizes, from 4K monitor to Nintendo Switch in docking mode. A cover overloaded with details requires the same density from the UI to avoid looking deceptive — and a dense interface almost always loses in terms of convenience. Therefore, the decision on visual complexity is made at the level of the game brand as a whole, not separately for each screen.
Case: how PlayStation Studios assembled Horizon into a unified font system
PlayStation Studios Creative Team approached the task systematically and developed not one, but two official typefaces for Horizon. Machine Nova is responsible for the logo itself and its scaling on covers, posters, and promotional materials — this is a static, recognizable brand mark. Hunter Nova is used in the UI and all supporting text within the game — in tooltips, item descriptions, and dialogues.
Separating tasks between two fonts is the very mechanism for synchronizing identity across different layers of the product. The logo does not have to be easily readable in a small type size on an inventory panel, and the interface text does not have to carry the entire brand dramaturgy. But both typefaces are cut from the same stylistic DNA — sharp notches, mechanical rigidity of forms — so even without a common letterform they are perceived as parts of a single system. A similar principle, but implemented through material rather than font, is realized in Anno: the logo-letter 'A' is physically manufactured by craftsman Owen Phillips from real metal within the concept of 'Crafted with Care', and then this information about materiality — the texture of metal, traces of forging — is transferred into the digital design of the interface and construction elements.
How large studios build a system over product layers
Different studios have different logics for building identity, but the principle is the same: some elements are fixed as brand constants, while others remain flexible for seasonal updates and marketing campaigns.
| Studio / project | What is fixed (constant) | What changes (variable) |
|---|---|---|
| PlayStation Studios — Horizon | Typefaces Machine Nova and Hunter Nova, mechanical geometry of forms | Color themes by season, composition of key arts |
| Ubisoft — Anno | Forged letter 'A', material texture, artisanal aesthetics | Historical era and palette for a specific part of the series |
| Bungie / Kurpa Khosk — Marathon | Core brand identity of the game and overall typography | Individual faction brands with their own visual identity |
| Respawn — Apex Legends Mobile | Logo, basic color system, silhouettes of UI icons | Seasonal visual themes every 6 weeks |
| Mojang — Minecraft | Grid 16×16 pixels for all graphic elements | Thematic sets of textures and skins |
Marathon from Bungie and Kurpa Khosk deserves a separate mention: for the warring factions, full sub-brands were developed that work simultaneously within the game, in social networks, on a Discord server with 400 thousand participants, and at offline pop-up events. This is no longer just a UI system, but a brand architecture — several identities within one game, synchronized by common layout and color-coding rules, but with different character.
Apex Legends Mobile describes its model metaphorically as 'a rubber band, not a mountain': the brand should stretch to accommodate seasonal updates, but not tear or lose recognizability. Some elements — the logo, silhouettes of character icons — are firmly fixed. Others — color accents, background patterns — change every six weeks along with the new content.
Where the unified identity usually breaks down
In practice, the breakdown of the system occurs not due to a lack of talent among designers, but due to organizational gaps in production. The most common failures are:
- Marketing team and UI team work with different brandbooks or even without a single document — the cover logo exists separately from the interface guideline.
- The typography of the cover is taken without adaptation: the complex decorative logo font does not scale well on small screens of Steam Deck or mobile devices, and as a result, a completely different, more 'safe' font appears in the UI.
- The color palette of the key art is not transferred to the UI kit — the interface is built using default colors of the engine or the component library.
- Seasonal updates change too many brand constants at once, causing the game to lose recognizability from patch to patch.
- The geometry of logo forms (angles, roundings, proportions) is not documented as a rule for icons and buttons, and each UI designer interprets the style in their own way.
How to maintain the system as a whole, not a set of parts
The unified identity of a video game is built from top to bottom: first, the geometry, palette, and typography principles are fixed at the logo level, then these decisions are translated into a style guide for UI, and only after that the cover composition is checked for compliance with what the player will see inside.
- To fix the geometric language of the logo — angles, curves, proportions — which is usually applicable to icons and buttons.
- To separate typography into 'image-based' (for cover and logo) and 'functional' (for UI), as was done with Machine Nova and Hunter Nova in Horizon.
- To prepare simplified versions of the logo and font for small screens in advance, rather than afterward, when the game is already released on Steam Deck.
- To define brand constants that never change and variables that allow seasonal updates — following the model of 'rubber, not mountain'.
- To test the cover composition for UI tone alignment before release, rather than relying on the assumption that players will 'understand the difference between marketing and product'.
Consistency of form, color, and spacing in the interface directly affects how the player reads the hierarchy of actions — attack, defense, purchase, upgrade. If this consistency is broken at the boundary between the cover and the first menu screen, the player loses orientation even before beginning to understand the mechanics. The game's identity works only as a system — where the logo, cover, and interface speak the same visual language at different volumes.
Recent articles
MegaFon, BMW, VTB and more 240+ companies. See how it looks in the showcase reel:
Our branding agency is approached to order:
Branding agency services
