Bank and fintech product identity
Color: why a bank chooses burgundy, while a fintech chooses mint
For a bank, color works like a notary's seal — it must instill the impression that the organization has existed for a long time and will not disappear anywhere. Hence the dark blue of Chase, burgundy in old City Bank layouts, gold accents in private banks. A fintech solves a different task: it must prove that money can be managed in three touches, not through a visit to a branch. Hence the mint color of Wise, coral and white of Revolut, black-and-white base with one bright accent in Monzo.
| Parameter | Traditional bank | Fintech product |
|---|---|---|
| Main emotion of the color | stability, status, legacy | speed, clarity, control |
| Typical palette | dark blue, burgundy, gold | mint, coral, black-and-white + one accent |
| Source of association | branch architecture, banknotes, heraldic seals | application interface, push notifications, status bars |
| Brand example | Chase, HSBC, Alfa-Bank | Wise, Revolut, Monzo |
Directly copying a bank's palette into a fintech product — a typical mistake made by young teams: dark blue with gold on a phone screen reads as 'this app is for applying for a loan,' not 'this app is for managing money in seconds.'
Symbols: mascot instead of a coat of arms
The bank builds its identity on static symbols that do not change for decades — a coat of arms, a monogram, a serif font in the name. Fintech instead of a coat of arms began using elements of its own interface as a visual language of the brand. A telling example is Dzengo: push notifications and system alerts of the app have become a trademark visual pattern used to decorate advertising banners, social media posts, and presentation slides for investors.
- Mascots and illustrative characters — reduce the barrier 'finance is complicated,' and work for the 18-30 age group audience.
- Patterns from UI elements (cards, checkboxes, status bars) — transform the screen into an identifiable visual code that is transferred to any medium;
- Contrastive font pairs — expressive for headings and neutral grotesque for numbers, so that emotion does not interfere with reading the balance;
- Rounded corners instead of sharp angles — visually convey 'friendly', while sharp angles in banking communicate 'strict and reliable'.
Banks in digital products often retain heavy typography and conservative heraldry even where technically it would be possible to simplify the interface — this is a conscious decision for an audience for whom age and organizational scale matter more than speed.
Design system: where money is lost in development
For fintech with multiple products (application, website, card, partner dashboard) style spreads faster than for a bank with one branch and one website. The reason is not in designers, but in the lack of tokens — variables through which the radius of rounding, line thickness, and grid step are defined. Without tokens, each layout is assembled manually and diverges from the others within two or three releases.
- Identify atomic elements — color, typography, iconography, spacing — and describe them with variables, not fixed values in the layout;
- Define 2-3 pre-set 'character' interfaces (soft, neutral, strict), switchable by changing the radius and line thickness values;
- Build a component library once and synchronize it between Figma and the codebase across all platforms;
- Specify what can be adapted to the platform (content density), and what remains unchanged (color, logo, text tone).
According to Sber Design System, a well-structured design system saves approximately 65 000 person-hours annually — this is about €2 million per year in development speed savings, not accounting for reputational losses from visual inconsistency between products.
Photo: handshake in a meeting room against a coffee mug on the table
Studio corporate photography — handshakes, perfect smiles, suits in a meeting room — is still the main visual language of banks of the old school. It reads as 'officially,' but not as 'humanly.' Tinkoff, Monzo and Starling went the opposite way: real situations, natural light, lack of forced smiles. A person with a coffee cup next to a laptop looks more believable than a stock photo model — and inspires more trust from the audience that has been exposed to advertising clichés.
The rule is simple: the younger and more digital the audience of the product, the further one should move away from studio shooting toward a documentary style — and the more conservative the audience, the more careful one should be in changing the familiar visual code.
Tone of voice as part of visual identity
Words are also part of identity, and fintech understood this earlier than banks. Where a bank writes 'Request' and 'Funds,' fintech writes 'Ask' and 'Money.' The difference is not in translation, but in positioning: a bank speaks to a client as an institution, fintech — as a service with an equal partner. This difference should be visible in the visual: sharp angles and a legal font convey distance, rounded shapes and a conversational tone in the interface — partnership. Mismatch between the tone of the text and the interface form is a common mistake: friendly rounded shapes with corporate text look fake.
Decision matrix: what to choose with a limited budget
The main mistake of small fintechs is copying 3D-illustrations and custom fonts of big players, spending half the round budget on this. The choice of tools should be driven by market positioning, not team ambitions.
| Situation | What to choose | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Startup, narrow niche, little budget | system font + one accent color + patterns from UI components | does not require custom assets, easily scales to new screens |
| Fintech for mass young audience | mascot or illustrative character + conversational tone | reduces fear of the financial topic, works on virality in social networks |
| B2B-fintech product | strict geometry, minimum illustrations, emphasis on data and charts | audience values functionality above emotions |
| Small regional bank | conservative palette + cautious typography updates | sharp departure from familiar image scares the age audience |
| A bank entering the digital segment | A hybrid identity: a classic brand core + a separate digital sub-brand | Does not lose the trust of the old audience, but speaks the language of the new one |
The bank's and fintech's identity solve the same task — to inspire trust — but through opposite mechanisms: scale and legacy versus speed and simplicity. The choice of a specific tool — color, mascot, voice tone, or design system token — should not be driven by competitors' references, but by the emotion that needs to be evoked in a specific audience at a specific point of contact with the product.
Color: why a bank chooses burgundy, while a fintech chooses mint
For a bank, color works like a notary's seal — it must instill the impression that the organization has existed for a long time and will not disappear anywhere. Hence the dark blue of Chase, burgundy in old City Bank layouts, gold accents in private banks. A fintech solves a different task: it must prove that money can be managed in three touches, not through a visit to a branch. Hence the mint color of Wise, coral and white of Revolut, black-and-white base with one bright accent in Monzo.
| Parameter | Traditional bank | Fintech product |
|---|---|---|
| Main emotion of the color | stability, status, legacy | speed, clarity, control |
| Typical palette | dark blue, burgundy, gold | mint, coral, black-and-white + one accent |
| Source of association | branch architecture, banknotes, heraldic seals | application interface, push notifications, status bars |
| Brand example | Chase, HSBC, Alfa-Bank | Wise, Revolut, Monzo |
Directly copying a bank's palette into a fintech product — a typical mistake made by young teams: dark blue with gold on a phone screen reads as 'this app is for applying for a loan,' not 'this app is for managing money in seconds.'
Symbols: mascot instead of a coat of arms
The bank builds its identity on static symbols that do not change for decades — a coat of arms, a monogram, a serif font in the name. Fintech instead of a coat of arms began using elements of its own interface as a visual language of the brand. A telling example is Dzengo: push notifications and system alerts of the app have become a trademark visual pattern used to decorate advertising banners, social media posts, and presentation slides for investors.
- Mascots and illustrative characters — reduce the barrier 'finance is complicated,' and work for the 18-30 age group audience.
- Patterns from UI elements (cards, checkboxes, status bars) — transform the screen into an identifiable visual code that is transferred to any medium;
- Contrastive font pairs — expressive for headings and neutral grotesque for numbers, so that emotion does not interfere with reading the balance;
- Rounded corners instead of sharp angles — visually convey 'friendly', while sharp angles in banking communicate 'strict and reliable'.
Banks in digital products often retain heavy typography and conservative heraldry even where technically it would be possible to simplify the interface — this is a conscious decision for an audience for whom age and organizational scale matter more than speed.
Design system: where money is lost in development
For fintech with multiple products (application, website, card, partner dashboard) style spreads faster than for a bank with one branch and one website. The reason is not in designers, but in the lack of tokens — variables through which the radius of rounding, line thickness, and grid step are defined. Without tokens, each layout is assembled manually and diverges from the others within two or three releases.
- Identify atomic elements — color, typography, iconography, spacing — and describe them with variables, not fixed values in the layout;
- Define 2-3 pre-set 'character' interfaces (soft, neutral, strict), switchable by changing the radius and line thickness values;
- Build a component library once and synchronize it between Figma and the codebase across all platforms;
- Specify what can be adapted to the platform (content density), and what remains unchanged (color, logo, text tone).
According to Sber Design System, a well-structured design system saves approximately 65 000 person-hours annually — this is about €2 million per year in development speed savings, not accounting for reputational losses from visual inconsistency between products.
Photo: handshake in a meeting room against a coffee mug on the table
Studio corporate photography — handshakes, perfect smiles, suits in a meeting room — is still the main visual language of banks of the old school. It reads as 'officially,' but not as 'humanly.' Tinkoff, Monzo and Starling went the opposite way: real situations, natural light, lack of forced smiles. A person with a coffee cup next to a laptop looks more believable than a stock photo model — and inspires more trust from the audience that has been exposed to advertising clichés.
The rule is simple: the younger and more digital the audience of the product, the further one should move away from studio shooting toward a documentary style — and the more conservative the audience, the more careful one should be in changing the familiar visual code.
Tone of voice as part of visual identity
Words are also part of identity, and fintech understood this earlier than banks. Where a bank writes 'Request' and 'Funds,' fintech writes 'Ask' and 'Money.' The difference is not in translation, but in positioning: a bank speaks to a client as an institution, fintech — as a service with an equal partner. This difference should be visible in the visual: sharp angles and a legal font convey distance, rounded shapes and a conversational tone in the interface — partnership. Mismatch between the tone of the text and the interface form is a common mistake: friendly rounded shapes with corporate text look fake.
Decision matrix: what to choose with a limited budget
The main mistake of small fintechs is copying 3D-illustrations and custom fonts of big players, spending half the round budget on this. The choice of tools should be driven by market positioning, not team ambitions.
| Situation | What to choose | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Startup, narrow niche, little budget | system font + one accent color + patterns from UI components | does not require custom assets, easily scales to new screens |
| Fintech for mass young audience | mascot or illustrative character + conversational tone | reduces fear of the financial topic, works on virality in social networks |
| B2B-fintech product | strict geometry, minimum illustrations, emphasis on data and charts | audience values functionality above emotions |
| Small regional bank | conservative palette + cautious typography updates | sharp departure from familiar image scares the age audience |
| A bank entering the digital segment | A hybrid identity: a classic brand core + a separate digital sub-brand | Does not lose the trust of the old audience, but speaks the language of the new one |
The bank's and fintech's identity solve the same task — to inspire trust — but through opposite mechanisms: scale and legacy versus speed and simplicity. The choice of a specific tool — color, mascot, voice tone, or design system token — should not be driven by competitors' references, but by the emotion that needs to be evoked in a specific audience at a specific point of contact with the product.
Recent articles
MegaFon, BMW, VTB and more 240+ companies. See how it looks in the showcase reel:
Our branding agency is approached to order:
Branding agency services
