Can free fonts be used in a commercial logo
What to do before adding a font to a logo
Designers rarely read license files in full — and this is the main reason for claims that come to clients two or three years after a brand launch. Checking takes 10 minutes, but saves from an amount with six zeros. The procedure is as follows:
- Open the license file that lies next to the font (usually OFL.txt or LICENSE.txt), and do not rely on the word 'free' on the download site.
- Check the font file's metadata — via Font Book on Mac or file properties in Windows: it indicates the copyright holder and often the type of license.
- Look for phrases such as 'commercial use', 'logo', 'trademark' in the license text — if they are not present at all, ask the copyright holder directly.
- Match the font name with the Google Fonts or Font Squirrel database — if it is there, the license is open and commercially safe.
- Save a screenshot or PDF copy of the license on the date of use — copyright holders and courts accept it as proof of good faith.
- If a font is downloaded not from the official website (archive, torrent, collection on a third-party resource) — consider it potentially illegal until the primary source is found.
Free for Personal Use — the main trap of free fonts
The «Free for Personal Use» category is tempting: the font costs 0 rubles, is downloaded without registration, and looks identical to paid analogs. But «personal use» legally means — not for a client, not for a brand, not for sale. A designer puts such a font in a logo because it fits beautifully into the layout, and often does not even realize that they are violating the terms.
- A font downloaded from Dafont without specifying the license type — cannot be considered conditionally free, you need to clarify with the author.
- The phrase 'for personal use only' appears in the file name or on the download page — a direct ban for business use.
- The font author is an individual without a legal entity or public offer — higher risk because there are no transparent terms for selling a commercial license.
- The font is significantly younger than similar paid versions and is distributed without specifying the license version — a reason to be cautious.
Desktop license and Logo license — different rights for the same file
Purchasing a font does not mean purchasing the right to use it in a logo. A desktop license usually allows installation on a computer, printing, and creating static images for internal use, but explicitly forbids embedding the font into the brand identity that will live on a website, in advertising, or on packaging. Most studios — Paratype, Brownfox, TypeType — have a separate Logo license for this, often with a fixed fee and no royalties.
| Parameter | Desktop license | Logo license |
|---|---|---|
| What is allowed | Installation on PC, printing, static layouts for internal use | Embedding in logo, use on website, in advertising, on packaging |
| Public use | Generally forbidden | Explicitly allowed |
| Transfer to client | Not automatically transferred, even if the logo is in curves | Requires separate purchase by the client in some studios |
| Duration of validity | Usually without time limitations for device usage | Can be bound to a specific brand or project |
Who is responsible if the font turned out to be illegal — the designer or the client
By default, the person who uses the font in commercial activities is responsible — that is, the brand owner, not the layout author. The copyright holder does not care who chose the font: the claim and lawsuit are directed at the company that places the logo on the website, signboard, or packaging. The designer can only be held accountable to the client within the terms of the contract — if it is explicitly stated in the contract that he guarantees the legality of the fonts used and purchases the necessary licenses.
That is why a contract for logo development should include a clause stating who is responsible for the legality of the typography: without such a clause, a company risks receiving a claim several years later, when the designer is no longer accessible or the studio has closed. The Moscow Fund of Renovation found itself exactly in such a situation — the court recovered about 1 million rubles from the brand style developer, but the fund's client still incurred reputational and time costs for the investigation.
How much does it cost in practice: courts 2021–2025 years
The number of lawsuits over fonts in Russia has increased nearly 2,5 times — from 6 in the period 2016–2020 to 14 in 2021–2025, and the total amount of recoveries rose from 5,3 to 15,3 million rubles. Right holders have long moved to automatic monitoring: services such as Genius Data and Font Radar, as well as neural networks that recognize fonts from logo images, find violations without manual checks.
- TypeType recovered 480 000 rubles from an insurance company for unauthorized use of a font in a brand style.
- The Artemy Lebedev Studio reached an agreement for 1 million rubles, which was later reduced to 48 000 rubles after negotiations.
- OOO «TypeType» filed a lawsuit for 1,5 million rubles against a St. Petersburg media outlet — the court recovered 300 000 rubles.
The range of amounts shows that the final recovery is almost always lower than the claimed amount, but the investigation itself takes months, involves lawyers, and inflicts reputational damage that can be avoided by checking the license at the start.
How the law protects fonts — and why registration is not needed
A font as a design object is protected by copyright from the moment work on it is completed — registration is not required, this follows directly from article 1257 of the Russian Civil Code. The protection lasts for 70 years, and this includes not only the design of each character, but also the font file's source code, which is also recognized as an object of copyright. Therefore, a claim could arrive even years after the logo launch — the statute of limitations does not prevent the copyright holder from suing if the infringement continues at the time of filing the lawsuit.
Google Fonts — a rare exception to the general picture of risk: approximately 1500 fonts from the service are distributed under OFL, Apache 2.0 or Ubuntu Font License licenses, which explicitly permit free commercial use, including embedding in logos, without additional fees or the need to purchase a separate Logo license. This makes Google Fonts the safest source for brands with limited budgets — but it does not eliminate the need to check the specific license for each font, as some do come with more restrictive terms.
What to do before adding a font to a logo
Designers rarely read license files in full — and this is the main reason for claims that come to clients two or three years after a brand launch. Checking takes 10 minutes, but saves from an amount with six zeros. The procedure is as follows:
- Open the license file that lies next to the font (usually OFL.txt or LICENSE.txt), and do not rely on the word 'free' on the download site.
- Check the font file's metadata — via Font Book on Mac or file properties in Windows: it indicates the copyright holder and often the type of license.
- Look for phrases such as 'commercial use', 'logo', 'trademark' in the license text — if they are not present at all, ask the copyright holder directly.
- Match the font name with the Google Fonts or Font Squirrel database — if it is there, the license is open and commercially safe.
- Save a screenshot or PDF copy of the license on the date of use — copyright holders and courts accept it as proof of good faith.
- If a font is downloaded not from the official website (archive, torrent, collection on a third-party resource) — consider it potentially illegal until the primary source is found.
Free for Personal Use — the main trap of free fonts
The «Free for Personal Use» category is tempting: the font costs 0 rubles, is downloaded without registration, and looks identical to paid analogs. But «personal use» legally means — not for a client, not for a brand, not for sale. A designer puts such a font in a logo because it fits beautifully into the layout, and often does not even realize that they are violating the terms.
- A font downloaded from Dafont without specifying the license type — cannot be considered conditionally free, you need to clarify with the author.
- The phrase 'for personal use only' appears in the file name or on the download page — a direct ban for business use.
- The font author is an individual without a legal entity or public offer — higher risk because there are no transparent terms for selling a commercial license.
- The font is significantly younger than similar paid versions and is distributed without specifying the license version — a reason to be cautious.
Desktop license and Logo license — different rights for the same file
Purchasing a font does not mean purchasing the right to use it in a logo. A desktop license usually allows installation on a computer, printing, and creating static images for internal use, but explicitly forbids embedding the font into the brand identity that will live on a website, in advertising, or on packaging. Most studios — Paratype, Brownfox, TypeType — have a separate Logo license for this, often with a fixed fee and no royalties.
| Parameter | Desktop license | Logo license |
|---|---|---|
| What is allowed | Installation on PC, printing, static layouts for internal use | Embedding in logo, use on website, in advertising, on packaging |
| Public use | Generally forbidden | Explicitly allowed |
| Transfer to client | Not automatically transferred, even if the logo is in curves | Requires separate purchase by the client in some studios |
| Duration of validity | Usually without time limitations for device usage | Can be bound to a specific brand or project |
Who is responsible if the font turned out to be illegal — the designer or the client
By default, the person who uses the font in commercial activities is responsible — that is, the brand owner, not the layout author. The copyright holder does not care who chose the font: the claim and lawsuit are directed at the company that places the logo on the website, signboard, or packaging. The designer can only be held accountable to the client within the terms of the contract — if it is explicitly stated in the contract that he guarantees the legality of the fonts used and purchases the necessary licenses.
That is why a contract for logo development should include a clause stating who is responsible for the legality of the typography: without such a clause, a company risks receiving a claim several years later, when the designer is no longer accessible or the studio has closed. The Moscow Fund of Renovation found itself exactly in such a situation — the court recovered about 1 million rubles from the brand style developer, but the fund's client still incurred reputational and time costs for the investigation.
How much does it cost in practice: courts 2021–2025 years
The number of lawsuits over fonts in Russia has increased nearly 2,5 times — from 6 in the period 2016–2020 to 14 in 2021–2025, and the total amount of recoveries rose from 5,3 to 15,3 million rubles. Right holders have long moved to automatic monitoring: services such as Genius Data and Font Radar, as well as neural networks that recognize fonts from logo images, find violations without manual checks.
- TypeType recovered 480 000 rubles from an insurance company for unauthorized use of a font in a brand style.
- The Artemy Lebedev Studio reached an agreement for 1 million rubles, which was later reduced to 48 000 rubles after negotiations.
- OOO «TypeType» filed a lawsuit for 1,5 million rubles against a St. Petersburg media outlet — the court recovered 300 000 rubles.
The range of amounts shows that the final recovery is almost always lower than the claimed amount, but the investigation itself takes months, involves lawyers, and inflicts reputational damage that can be avoided by checking the license at the start.
How the law protects fonts — and why registration is not needed
A font as a design object is protected by copyright from the moment work on it is completed — registration is not required, this follows directly from article 1257 of the Russian Civil Code. The protection lasts for 70 years, and this includes not only the design of each character, but also the font file's source code, which is also recognized as an object of copyright. Therefore, a claim could arrive even years after the logo launch — the statute of limitations does not prevent the copyright holder from suing if the infringement continues at the time of filing the lawsuit.
Google Fonts — a rare exception to the general picture of risk: approximately 1500 fonts from the service are distributed under OFL, Apache 2.0 or Ubuntu Font License licenses, which explicitly permit free commercial use, including embedding in logos, without additional fees or the need to purchase a separate Logo license. This makes Google Fonts the safest source for brands with limited budgets — but it does not eliminate the need to check the specific license for each font, as some do come with more restrictive terms.
Recent articles
MegaFon, BMW, VTB and more 240+ companies. See how it looks in the showcase reel:
Our branding agency is approached to order:
Branding agency services
