A logo is not a picture that can be drawn on inspiration in one evening. It is the result of decisions: who it should appeal to, where it will be placed, what it should convey within 0,3 seconds of a glance. Without the research stage, a designer draws beautifully, but blindly — and the client receives a sign that is good in itself, but does not solve the business task.
A chaotic process is the main reason for conflicts between the client and the contractor. The client wants it to look 'prettier,' the designer defends their aesthetics, and both sides argue about taste instead of relying on fixed criteria. A structured process removes subjectivity from decision-making moments: at each stage, there is a document or test, not just an opinion.
The first stage is working with information, not forms. A good agency spends from three days to two weeks on this, depending on the complexity of the business.
The outcome of this stage is not images, but a short document: 3-5 meaningful directions and justification of why they suit this business specifically.
Next comes idea generation — with pencil on paper, not straight into vector. Experienced designers make 30-50 rough sketches in the direction, select 3-5 strong ones from them, and only these are developed into digital form.
Clients are usually shown 2-3 different concepts, not ten — this is a common misconception that the more options there are, the better the choice. In practice, an excess of options blurs the decision: the client gets lost and asks to 'mix everything'. A proper presentation is 2-3 well-founded directions, each with its own logic, not a set of random images.
The difference between theory and the real process is clearly visible in an example. Imagine developing a logo for a chain of five coffee shops entering a new city. The client initially wanted 'something with coffee beans' — a standard request that constantly appears in briefs.
During the audit it was found: among 20 competitors, 14 used beans or a cup in their logo. The designers proposed three directions instead of the expected bean: a monogram from the first letter of the name, an abstract form evoking the movement of steam, and a text logo with an accent element in the letter. The client chose the monogram — it worked better on small formats: cups, badges on barista uniforms, favicon on the website.
Next, the mark was run through testing:
After the test, the monogram was slightly simplified: one notch was removed which merged with the background when reduced. It was the testing on real carriers, and not only on screen, that saved the project from having to redo the logo after the signs were already printed — which would have been an expensive mistake.
Industry standard — 2-3 rounds of revisions included in the project cost. The first round usually involves major changes — form, composition. The second — details: line thickness, spacing. The third — final polishing before delivery.
| Revision round | What is changed | Typical timeframe |
|---|---|---|
| First | Form, composition, overall idea | 2-4 day |
| Second | Details: lines, proportions, font | 1-2 day |
| Third | Final polishing, color | 1 day |
If after three rounds the client asks to 'start from scratch,' this is a signal that an error was made during the research phase: the concepts did not match expectations. It is meaningless to push through with the fourth and fifth rounds of revisions — one must return to the brief.
A weak point of many projects is precisely the final stage. The client receives one PNG with the logo on a white background and that's it. Half a year later, it turns out that a different format is needed for typography, and the logo looks blurry on the banner.
The full package should include:
Without a brand guide, a logo quickly begins to live its own life: it gets compressed, stretched, placed on inappropriate backgrounds—and after a year it looks completely different from how it was originally conceived.
A realistic timeframe for a logo for medium-sized business is four to eight weeks, assuming the process proceeds without delays caused by the client. Projects that promise a logo within 3 days skip either research or testing—and this will inevitably show later, when the mark fails to work in real conditions: on a small icon, on a sign, in black-and-white printing.
A logo is not a picture that can be drawn on inspiration in one evening. It is the result of decisions: who it should appeal to, where it will be placed, what it should convey within 0,3 seconds of a glance. Without the research stage, a designer draws beautifully, but blindly — and the client receives a sign that is good in itself, but does not solve the business task.
A chaotic process is the main reason for conflicts between the client and the contractor. The client wants it to look 'prettier,' the designer defends their aesthetics, and both sides argue about taste instead of relying on fixed criteria. A structured process removes subjectivity from decision-making moments: at each stage, there is a document or test, not just an opinion.
The first stage is working with information, not forms. A good agency spends from three days to two weeks on this, depending on the complexity of the business.
The outcome of this stage is not images, but a short document: 3-5 meaningful directions and justification of why they suit this business specifically.
Next comes idea generation — with pencil on paper, not straight into vector. Experienced designers make 30-50 rough sketches in the direction, select 3-5 strong ones from them, and only these are developed into digital form.
Clients are usually shown 2-3 different concepts, not ten — this is a common misconception that the more options there are, the better the choice. In practice, an excess of options blurs the decision: the client gets lost and asks to 'mix everything'. A proper presentation is 2-3 well-founded directions, each with its own logic, not a set of random images.
The difference between theory and the real process is clearly visible in an example. Imagine developing a logo for a chain of five coffee shops entering a new city. The client initially wanted 'something with coffee beans' — a standard request that constantly appears in briefs.
During the audit it was found: among 20 competitors, 14 used beans or a cup in their logo. The designers proposed three directions instead of the expected bean: a monogram from the first letter of the name, an abstract form evoking the movement of steam, and a text logo with an accent element in the letter. The client chose the monogram — it worked better on small formats: cups, badges on barista uniforms, favicon on the website.
Next, the mark was run through testing:
After the test, the monogram was slightly simplified: one notch was removed which merged with the background when reduced. It was the testing on real carriers, and not only on screen, that saved the project from having to redo the logo after the signs were already printed — which would have been an expensive mistake.
Industry standard — 2-3 rounds of revisions included in the project cost. The first round usually involves major changes — form, composition. The second — details: line thickness, spacing. The third — final polishing before delivery.
| Revision round | What is changed | Typical timeframe |
|---|---|---|
| First | Form, composition, overall idea | 2-4 day |
| Second | Details: lines, proportions, font | 1-2 day |
| Third | Final polishing, color | 1 day |
If after three rounds the client asks to 'start from scratch,' this is a signal that an error was made during the research phase: the concepts did not match expectations. It is meaningless to push through with the fourth and fifth rounds of revisions — one must return to the brief.
A weak point of many projects is precisely the final stage. The client receives one PNG with the logo on a white background and that's it. Half a year later, it turns out that a different format is needed for typography, and the logo looks blurry on the banner.
The full package should include:
Without a brand guide, a logo quickly begins to live its own life: it gets compressed, stretched, placed on inappropriate backgrounds—and after a year it looks completely different from how it was originally conceived.
A realistic timeframe for a logo for medium-sized business is four to eight weeks, assuming the process proceeds without delays caused by the client. Projects that promise a logo within 3 days skip either research or testing—and this will inevitably show later, when the mark fails to work in real conditions: on a small icon, on a sign, in black-and-white printing.