The difference is not in the quality of the image — a decent logo can be drawn by a student or a top agency. The difference is in what lies behind the result: research, methodology, responsibility, and how well the logo will work as part of an identity system, not as a separate image.
| Format | Price in Russia | What you get | When it fits |
|---|---|---|---|
| Freelance platforms | 500–15 000 ₽ | Ready file without research, often without a guideline | Hobby project, hypothesis test, minimal budget |
| Experienced freelancer | 15 000–80 000 ₽ | Personal approach, limited number of concepts, basic guideline | Small business with a clear audience |
| Design studio | 80 000–250 000 ₽ | Team, process, several concepts, revisions, files for all needs | Growing business, franchise, regional network |
| Branding Agency | 250 000–800 000 ₽ | Strategy, competitor analysis, full logo book, support for implementation | Company for which the brand is an asset, not decoration |
| Top agency | from 800 000 ₽ | Deep strategy, expertise in the category, reputational weight | Large business, entering a new market, rebranding with a history |
The mistake that almost everyone makes is choosing a format based on the name rather than the content of the task. If a logo is needed for one local cafe without ambitions for a chain, then an agency costing 500 thousand is overpaying for a process the business doesn't need. If you're building a franchise, saving money on a freelancer will backfire because in a year the logo will have to be redone, as it won't scale.
This is the moment that most guides skip over, yet it determines everything. A good designer asks more questions than they answer during the first meeting. They don't ask 'what color do you like,' but rather who your audience is, what sets you apart from the three closest competitors, and where the logo will be used most often — on a sign, in an app, or on packaging.
If during 15 minutes of conversation your counterpart hasn't asked anything about the business model, target audience, or competitors — this is a red flag that almost always triggers. Such a specialist will solve an aesthetic task, not a business one, and the result will be beautiful but random.
A typical mistake is evaluating a portfolio like a gallery of pictures and choosing whoever has the most visually appealing logos. This is the wrong criterion: it shows the designer's taste, not their ability to solve various tasks.
Part of the signals are visible immediately, and part is only visible in the correspondence. We've gathered everything that should stop a deal without exceptions.
A logo without a guideline is a beautiful image that will start to spread already on the second business card, because each subsequent contractor will use it in their own way. At minimum, a guideline on 1-3 pages with rules is needed: acceptable color variations, safe field, minimum size, prohibited distortions.
A separate and critical topic — file formats. They need to be checked before the final payment is made, not after.
| File type | Format | Why it's needed |
|---|---|---|
| Vector | AI, EPS, SVG | Scaling without quality loss, printing on any media |
| Raster | PNG (with transparent background), JPG in several sizes | Use in social networks, on the website, in presentations |
| Guidelines | Rules for use by any future contractor |
If the executor only delivers PNG or JPG without sources — this is not time-saving, but a way to keep the client dependent: any change in size or color will have to be ordered from the same person for the duration of the relationship.
Before signing the contract, it makes sense to ask five questions and evaluate not the answers themselves, but how specific they are.
A practical way to turn these answers into a solution is to assign each point a score from 0 to 2: 0 if the answer is evasive or missing, 1 if there is one but without details, 2 if the answer is specific and supported by an example from practice. A total below 6 out of 10 is a signal to look for another performer, regardless of how much you liked the portfolio.
The difference is not in the quality of the image — a decent logo can be drawn by a student or a top agency. The difference is in what lies behind the result: research, methodology, responsibility, and how well the logo will work as part of an identity system, not as a separate image.
| Format | Price in Russia | What you get | When it fits |
|---|---|---|---|
| Freelance platforms | 500–15 000 ₽ | Ready file without research, often without a guideline | Hobby project, hypothesis test, minimal budget |
| Experienced freelancer | 15 000–80 000 ₽ | Personal approach, limited number of concepts, basic guideline | Small business with a clear audience |
| Design studio | 80 000–250 000 ₽ | Team, process, several concepts, revisions, files for all needs | Growing business, franchise, regional network |
| Branding Agency | 250 000–800 000 ₽ | Strategy, competitor analysis, full logo book, support for implementation | Company for which the brand is an asset, not decoration |
| Top agency | from 800 000 ₽ | Deep strategy, expertise in the category, reputational weight | Large business, entering a new market, rebranding with a history |
The mistake that almost everyone makes is choosing a format based on the name rather than the content of the task. If a logo is needed for one local cafe without ambitions for a chain, then an agency costing 500 thousand is overpaying for a process the business doesn't need. If you're building a franchise, saving money on a freelancer will backfire because in a year the logo will have to be redone, as it won't scale.
This is the moment that most guides skip over, yet it determines everything. A good designer asks more questions than they answer during the first meeting. They don't ask 'what color do you like,' but rather who your audience is, what sets you apart from the three closest competitors, and where the logo will be used most often — on a sign, in an app, or on packaging.
If during 15 minutes of conversation your counterpart hasn't asked anything about the business model, target audience, or competitors — this is a red flag that almost always triggers. Such a specialist will solve an aesthetic task, not a business one, and the result will be beautiful but random.
A typical mistake is evaluating a portfolio like a gallery of pictures and choosing whoever has the most visually appealing logos. This is the wrong criterion: it shows the designer's taste, not their ability to solve various tasks.
Part of the signals are visible immediately, and part is only visible in the correspondence. We've gathered everything that should stop a deal without exceptions.
A logo without a guideline is a beautiful image that will start to spread already on the second business card, because each subsequent contractor will use it in their own way. At minimum, a guideline on 1-3 pages with rules is needed: acceptable color variations, safe field, minimum size, prohibited distortions.
A separate and critical topic — file formats. They need to be checked before the final payment is made, not after.
| File type | Format | Why it's needed |
|---|---|---|
| Vector | AI, EPS, SVG | Scaling without quality loss, printing on any media |
| Raster | PNG (with transparent background), JPG in several sizes | Use in social networks, on the website, in presentations |
| Guidelines | Rules for use by any future contractor |
If the executor only delivers PNG or JPG without sources — this is not time-saving, but a way to keep the client dependent: any change in size or color will have to be ordered from the same person for the duration of the relationship.
Before signing the contract, it makes sense to ask five questions and evaluate not the answers themselves, but how specific they are.
A practical way to turn these answers into a solution is to assign each point a score from 0 to 2: 0 if the answer is evasive or missing, 1 if there is one but without details, 2 if the answer is specific and supported by an example from practice. A total below 6 out of 10 is a signal to look for another performer, regardless of how much you liked the portfolio.