UX-raitings as a tool for digital branding
Why the text on a button is branding work, not design
The designer is responsible for ensuring the button is noticeable and placed in the correct spot on the screen. But what is written on it — "Send", "Done", or "Book now" — this is a decision about the brand's character, not about the mockup. The user does not read the brand book before placing an order. They draw conclusions about the company based on how understandable and human the interface is.
An error message is the most indicative example. Technically, one can write "Something went wrong" — this will take five minutes of work. But such text does not explain what happened and leaves the user alone with the problem. A good UX text is built on the formula: what happened + why + what to do. Compare: "Your card has expired. Update it in Settings → Payment Methods" — here the user receives not only a diagnosis but also a path to the solution. This is the difference between a brand that cares and a brand that simply exists.
The case of the «Profi» service confirms this with numbers, not arguments: without a single technical revision, only thanks to the formulation «Even refusal is better than silence» in the message to specialists, the response rate increased by 17%. The text itself became a tool for optimizing business metrics — something that was previously considered the prerogative of product or marketing.
How voice and tone work within UX-writing
Many people confuse these concepts, although the difference is fundamental for brand management through text. Voice is the immutable identity of the brand, what it remains always, regardless of the situation. Tone is the emotional adjustment of this identity to the context: in an error message, the voice sounds softer, in an announcement of a new feature — more energetic.
| Parameter | Voice | Tone |
|---|---|---|
| What is it | A stable brand personality | Emotional adaptation to the situation |
| Does it change | No, it remains constant | Yes, it depends on the context |
| Example | A 'honest and straightforward' brand | In a complaint — restrained, in an announcement — with enthusiasm |
| Who is responsible | Brand strategy in collaboration with a UX writer | A UX writer at the level of a specific screen |
UX writing manages both levels simultaneously. If the brand's voice is 'straightforward and honest,' and an error message is written in the bureaucratic language of technical documentation, the user perceives a disconnect between the declared values and the real experience. Consistency of voice in all interface texts is one of the most reliable signs of a strong brand, because it cannot be faked once, only systematically.
Where to start implementing a UX writing guideline
Companies often try to write a content policy in a week using the efforts of a single copywriter — and end up with a document that no one uses. At Kolesa Group, the editorial policy was developed over seven months, but the result justified the time invested: texts began to be created faster, the number of revisions decreased, and new employees integrated into the work more quickly because they now had a single source of truth.
- Conduct an audit of existing interface texts and document discrepancies with the brand voice.
- Formulate the brand voice through 3-4 adjectives with examples of 'how we sound' and 'how we don't sound'.
- Describe tone variations for typical situations: error, success, empty state, onboarding.
- Compile a glossary of terms — how to name functions, buttons, statuses to avoid misinterpretations.
- Train product teams and designers to work with the guideline during the mockup stage, not after release.
- Appoint a document owner who will update it upon release of new features.
The main mistake of organizations is to consider the brand guidelines as a one-time artifact, not as a living process. The second frequent failure is delegating the writing of texts to designers 'by residual principle', without involving the person responsible for the overall brand voice.
How to understand that UX-rewriting works for the brand
Interface texts cannot be evaluated only subjectively — 'like' or 'don't like'. Metrics tied to business results and testing are needed, just as in any other brand channel.
| Case | What was changed | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Pro | Message text for specialists | +17% response rate |
| Westline | About us section and product descriptions in human language | +15 percentage points conversion to inquiry (B2B) |
| A/B test registration | Field formulation 'Enter your ID in the system' | +18% completed registrations |
It is revealing that in the registration case, the text worked differently for different age groups — this proves that UX-rewriting cannot be implemented 'by eye' and without audience segmentation, just like any other branding tool. Among the metrics that should be tracked: conversion at a specific step, the share of support inquiries related to the topic explained by the text, NPS after interaction with the problematic screen, onboarding completion speed. If the text was changed but none of these indicators shifted — it is likely the problem is not in the formulation but in the scenario itself.
Mistakes that quietly destroy the brand through text
- Technical jargon in error messages makes the user feel foolish, not informed.
- Different tone on adjacent screens: a friendly onboarding and dry legal notices create a feeling of brand personality fragmentation.
- Copying competitors' formulations without adapting them to your own voice makes the text impersonal.
- The absence of a 'Plan B' in an error message leaves the user stuck, as the phrase offers no specific action.
- Ignoring localization of tone for different audience segments, despite A/B data clearly showing differences in age-based perception.
Each of these errors seems minor in isolation, but it is precisely from dozens of such details that the impression of the company is formed—well before the user sees an advertising video or reads the mission statement on the website. UX-rewriting should be considered not as the final touch before launch, but as a full-fledged brand communication channel that requires strategy, testing, and an owner—just like visual identity or voice in advertising.
An error message is the most indicative example. Technically, one can write "Something went wrong" — this will take five minutes of work. But such text does not explain what happened and leaves the user alone with the problem. A good UX text is built on the formula: what happened + why + what to do. Compare: "Your card has expired. Update it in Settings → Payment Methods" — here the user receives not only a diagnosis but also a path to the solution. This is the difference between a brand that cares and a brand that simply exists.
The case of the «Profi» service confirms this with numbers, not arguments: without a single technical revision, only thanks to the formulation «Even refusal is better than silence» in the message to specialists, the response rate increased by 17%. The text itself became a tool for optimizing business metrics — something that was previously considered the prerogative of product or marketing.
How voice and tone work within UX-writing
Many people confuse these concepts, although the difference is fundamental for brand management through text. Voice is the immutable identity of the brand, what it remains always, regardless of the situation. Tone is the emotional adjustment of this identity to the context: in an error message, the voice sounds softer, in an announcement of a new feature — more energetic.
| Parameter | Voice | Tone |
|---|---|---|
| What is it | A stable brand personality | Emotional adaptation to the situation |
| Does it change | No, it remains constant | Yes, it depends on the context |
| Example | A 'honest and straightforward' brand | In a complaint — restrained, in an announcement — with enthusiasm |
| Who is responsible | Brand strategy in collaboration with a UX writer | A UX writer at the level of a specific screen |
UX writing manages both levels simultaneously. If the brand's voice is 'straightforward and honest,' and an error message is written in the bureaucratic language of technical documentation, the user perceives a disconnect between the declared values and the real experience. Consistency of voice in all interface texts is one of the most reliable signs of a strong brand, because it cannot be faked once, only systematically.
Where to start implementing a UX writing guideline
Companies often try to write a content policy in a week using the efforts of a single copywriter — and end up with a document that no one uses. At Kolesa Group, the editorial policy was developed over seven months, but the result justified the time invested: texts began to be created faster, the number of revisions decreased, and new employees integrated into the work more quickly because they now had a single source of truth.
- Conduct an audit of existing interface texts and document discrepancies with the brand voice.
- Formulate the brand voice through 3-4 adjectives with examples of 'how we sound' and 'how we don't sound'.
- Describe tone variations for typical situations: error, success, empty state, onboarding.
- Compile a glossary of terms — how to name functions, buttons, statuses to avoid misinterpretations.
- Train product teams and designers to work with the guideline during the mockup stage, not after release.
- Appoint a document owner who will update it upon release of new features.
The main mistake of organizations is to consider the brand guidelines as a one-time artifact, not as a living process. The second frequent failure is delegating the writing of texts to designers 'by residual principle', without involving the person responsible for the overall brand voice.
How to understand that UX-rewriting works for the brand
Interface texts cannot be evaluated only subjectively — 'like' or 'don't like'. Metrics tied to business results and testing are needed, just as in any other brand channel.
| Case | What was changed | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Pro | Message text for specialists | +17% response rate |
| Westline | About us section and product descriptions in human language | +15 percentage points conversion to inquiry (B2B) |
| A/B test registration | Field formulation 'Enter your ID in the system' | +18% completed registrations |
It is revealing that in the registration case, the text worked differently for different age groups — this proves that UX-rewriting cannot be implemented 'by eye' and without audience segmentation, just like any other branding tool. Among the metrics that should be tracked: conversion at a specific step, the share of support inquiries related to the topic explained by the text, NPS after interaction with the problematic screen, onboarding completion speed. If the text was changed but none of these indicators shifted — it is likely the problem is not in the formulation but in the scenario itself.
Mistakes that quietly destroy the brand through text
- Technical jargon in error messages makes the user feel foolish, not informed.
- Different tone on adjacent screens: a friendly onboarding and dry legal notices create a feeling of brand personality fragmentation.
- Copying competitors' formulations without adapting them to your own voice makes the text impersonal.
- The absence of a 'Plan B' in an error message leaves the user stuck, as the phrase offers no specific action.
- Ignoring localization of tone for different audience segments, despite A/B data clearly showing differences in age-based perception.
Each of these errors seems minor in isolation, but it is precisely from dozens of such details that the impression of the company is formed—well before the user sees an advertising video or reads the mission statement on the website. UX-rewriting should be considered not as the final touch before launch, but as a full-fledged brand communication channel that requires strategy, testing, and an owner—just like visual identity or voice in advertising.
Recent articles
MegaFon, BMW, VTB and more 240+ companies. See how it looks in the showcase reel:
Our branding agency is approached to order:
Branding agency services
