NFT as a branding tool
The essence of the tool: NFT is a pass, not a picture
The mistake of most projects is perceiving NFT as a digital collectible item. In practice, the token works as an access key: to a closed community, to early releases, to offline experiences. It is exactly this mechanism — token-gating — that shows engagement metrics higher than in traditional email and social media campaigns: on crypto-native sites, wallet connection reaches 15–25% (versus 2–5% click-through rate in email). The difference is simple: a person who bought a token has already invested money and attention, and their subsequent activity is motivated not by advertising, but by the status of owner.
Michelin built its 3xplorer club on this principle: 2400 unique character designs of Bibendum gave over 500 holders access to real gastronomic experiences. Here, NFT is not a product, but an audience filter — exactly like a physical pass to a closed event, only with the ability to verify the owner on the blockchain.
How to measure effectiveness: metrics, not token price
Price growth on the secondary market is a bad KPI, because it depends on speculative demand, not brand loyalty. The Starbucks Odyssey collection increased in price from $100 to the average value of $442 (+342%), while Dom Pérignon × Lady Gaga saw a rise of 1500% — impressive figures for a report, but they do not answer the question of whether these buyers returned to the brand for a repeat purchase.
| Metric | What it shows | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Sell-out speed | The strength of brand community at the start | Ritter Sport — 256 NFT in 36 hours |
| Uniqueness of holders (holder distribution) | Real reach, not bot accumulation | Ritter Sport — 77% unique ownership |
| Retention of token holders | Return to product/channel after purchase | Michelin: 500+ repeat offline visits |
| Conversion to token gate | Effectiveness versus classic advertising | 15–25% vs 2% |
| Media reach without accounting for hype | PR effect as a standalone KPI | Gazprom Neft: 16,3 million (Media 9,1 million, social networks 5,6 million, Telegram 1,6 million) |
A correct ROI calculation takes into account not only revenue from the initial sale, but also the cost of acquiring a holder compared to CAC through other channels, plus LTV of those who remain in the community after 6–12 months.
Luxury and mid-market — different logics, different mistakes
Luxury brands use NFTs as a continuation of status storytelling — the token confirms authenticity and rarity, reinforcing what the physical product has been doing for decades. Mid-market businesses often blindly copy this mechanism, forgetting they lack both a collector audience and the resources for legal and technical support of smart contracts.
- Mistake #1 — launching NFTs instead of a loyalty program where the customer needs a simple accumulating discount, not a crypto wallet.
- Mistake #2 — lack of utility: a token without access to anything real loses meaning within the first week after the hype.
- Mistake #3 — underestimating the technical barrier: the customer needs a wallet, gas, and understanding of blockchain — for the B2C-segment this excludes a large portion of the audience.
- Mistake #4 — calculating for a one-time effect without a plan to support the collection for at least a year ahead.
How to integrate NFTs into a strategy so it’s not just a one-time hype
- Define the token’s utility before design — access, discount, early release, physical twin.
- Link the NFT to an existing CRM and loyalty program, not create a parallel universe.
- Choose a platform for the audience: a closed marketplace for luxury, or a public blockchain with a low entry threshold — for a mass-market product.
- Plan the budget for a minimum of 12 months of community support after the release.
- Consider the phygital transition: as shown by Pudgy Penguins, sales of physical toys from this NFT project exceeded $10 million, and the product appeared in more than 10 000 Walmart stores — the digital asset became an entry point into real retail, not an end goal.
Legal risks: where the boundary of IP lies
The leading precedent is the case of Hermès versus the artist who released the MetaBirkins collection. The court ruled that trademark rights were violated and ordered the defendant to pay $133 000. The decision is important because it closed the argument that 'this is digital art, not a counterfeit' — a brand can protect its identity in metaverses just as it can offline.
For companies planning their own collection, this means three mandatory steps: registering rights to digital assets separately from the physical trademark, clear terms of use in the smart contract (what the buyer gets and what they don’t get — commercial rights to the image or just token ownership), and monitoring secondary platforms for unauthorized copies bearing brand symbolism.
Who remained in Web3 after the decline of 2023–2024 and why
Tiffany, Prada, and Dolce & Gabbana significantly reduced their NFT activity by 2024 — they used tokens as a one-time marketing gesture without built-in utility, and when the market cooled, there was nothing left to sustain interest. Starbucks Odyssey, despite a promising start — 2000 tokens sold at $100 within 18 minutes — was also shut down because the mechanics remained tied to speculative value rather than everyday product.
Gucci remains the only luxury brand with continuous NFT activity since 2021 year — because it integrated tokens into the brand's long-term digital identity strategy, rather than releasing them as a one-time campaign. Michelin and Pudgy Penguins are resilient for the same reason: their tokens are part of a constantly operating ecosystem with offline presence, rather than a standalone product dependent on market speculation interest.
The essence of the tool: NFT is a pass, not a picture
The mistake of most projects is perceiving NFT as a digital collectible item. In practice, the token works as an access key: to a closed community, to early releases, to offline experiences. It is exactly this mechanism — token-gating — that shows engagement metrics higher than in traditional email and social media campaigns: on crypto-native sites, wallet connection reaches 15–25% (versus 2–5% click-through rate in email). The difference is simple: a person who bought a token has already invested money and attention, and their subsequent activity is motivated not by advertising, but by the status of owner.
Michelin built its 3xplorer club on this principle: 2400 unique character designs of Bibendum gave over 500 holders access to real gastronomic experiences. Here, NFT is not a product, but an audience filter — exactly like a physical pass to a closed event, only with the ability to verify the owner on the blockchain.
How to measure effectiveness: metrics, not token price
Price growth on the secondary market is a bad KPI, because it depends on speculative demand, not brand loyalty. The Starbucks Odyssey collection increased in price from $100 to the average value of $442 (+342%), while Dom Pérignon × Lady Gaga saw a rise of 1500% — impressive figures for a report, but they do not answer the question of whether these buyers returned to the brand for a repeat purchase.
| Metric | What it shows | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Sell-out speed | The strength of brand community at the start | Ritter Sport — 256 NFT in 36 hours |
| Uniqueness of holders (holder distribution) | Real reach, not bot accumulation | Ritter Sport — 77% unique ownership |
| Retention of token holders | Return to product/channel after purchase | Michelin: 500+ repeat offline visits |
| Conversion to token gate | Effectiveness versus classic advertising | 15–25% vs 2% |
| Media reach without accounting for hype | PR effect as a standalone KPI | Gazprom Neft: 16,3 million (Media 9,1 million, social networks 5,6 million, Telegram 1,6 million) |
A correct ROI calculation takes into account not only revenue from the initial sale, but also the cost of acquiring a holder compared to CAC through other channels, plus LTV of those who remain in the community after 6–12 months.
Luxury and mid-market — different logics, different mistakes
Luxury brands use NFTs as a continuation of status storytelling — the token confirms authenticity and rarity, reinforcing what the physical product has been doing for decades. Mid-market businesses often blindly copy this mechanism, forgetting they lack both a collector audience and the resources for legal and technical support of smart contracts.
- Mistake #1 — launching NFTs instead of a loyalty program where the customer needs a simple accumulating discount, not a crypto wallet.
- Mistake #2 — lack of utility: a token without access to anything real loses meaning within the first week after the hype.
- Mistake #3 — underestimating the technical barrier: the customer needs a wallet, gas, and understanding of blockchain — for the B2C-segment this excludes a large portion of the audience.
- Mistake #4 — calculating for a one-time effect without a plan to support the collection for at least a year ahead.
How to integrate NFTs into a strategy so it’s not just a one-time hype
- Define the token’s utility before design — access, discount, early release, physical twin.
- Link the NFT to an existing CRM and loyalty program, not create a parallel universe.
- Choose a platform for the audience: a closed marketplace for luxury, or a public blockchain with a low entry threshold — for a mass-market product.
- Plan the budget for a minimum of 12 months of community support after the release.
- Consider the phygital transition: as shown by Pudgy Penguins, sales of physical toys from this NFT project exceeded $10 million, and the product appeared in more than 10 000 Walmart stores — the digital asset became an entry point into real retail, not an end goal.
Legal risks: where the boundary of IP lies
The leading precedent is the case of Hermès versus the artist who released the MetaBirkins collection. The court ruled that trademark rights were violated and ordered the defendant to pay $133 000. The decision is important because it closed the argument that 'this is digital art, not a counterfeit' — a brand can protect its identity in metaverses just as it can offline.
For companies planning their own collection, this means three mandatory steps: registering rights to digital assets separately from the physical trademark, clear terms of use in the smart contract (what the buyer gets and what they don’t get — commercial rights to the image or just token ownership), and monitoring secondary platforms for unauthorized copies bearing brand symbolism.
Who remained in Web3 after the decline of 2023–2024 and why
Tiffany, Prada, and Dolce & Gabbana significantly reduced their NFT activity by 2024 — they used tokens as a one-time marketing gesture without built-in utility, and when the market cooled, there was nothing left to sustain interest. Starbucks Odyssey, despite a promising start — 2000 tokens sold at $100 within 18 minutes — was also shut down because the mechanics remained tied to speculative value rather than everyday product.
Gucci remains the only luxury brand with continuous NFT activity since 2021 year — because it integrated tokens into the brand's long-term digital identity strategy, rather than releasing them as a one-time campaign. Michelin and Pudgy Penguins are resilient for the same reason: their tokens are part of a constantly operating ecosystem with offline presence, rather than a standalone product dependent on market speculation interest.
Recent articles
MegaFon, BMW, VTB and more 240+ companies. See how it looks in the showcase reel:
Our branding agency is approached to order:
Branding agency services
