A brandbook is an authorial work within the meaning of Article 1259 of the Russian Civil Code. Rights to it arise automatically upon creation, without any registration. The problem is that copyright protects against direct copying of a specific file, layout, or text. If a competitor has not stolen your PDF but simply created a ‘similar’ logo with different hands — it is extremely difficult to prove copyright infringement.
A trademark works differently. According to Article 1484 of the Russian Civil Code, exclusive rights to it arise only from the moment of registration with Rospatent. Simple active use of a name for years does not create exclusive legal rights — this is a common misconception among entrepreneurs. However, a registered mark protects much more broadly: from use of any designations similar to the degree of confusion, not just exact copies.
| Parameter | Brandbook (copyright) | Trademark |
|---|---|---|
| Moment of right emergence | Automatically upon creation | Only after registration with Rospatent |
| Duration of validity | Life of the author + 70 years | 10 years, renewable indefinitely |
| What it protects against | From direct copying of the work | From similarity up to the degree of confusion |
| Compensation for infringement | Difficult to prove, amounts are often minimal | From 10 000 to 12 million rubles (Article 1515 of the Russian Civil Code) |
| Level of protection | Medium | High, presumption of ownership |
A brandbook is a set of descriptions and rules, not an object of protection in itself. What needs to be registered is not the document, but its individual elements, and not all of them are suitable for a trademark.
A small chain of coffee shops ordered a full brandbook with a logo, a pattern for cup packaging, and a color usage guideline from an agency. A year later, a chain opened in a neighboring city with an almost identical logo and the same color scheme — only the name differed by a couple of letters. The owner of the coffee shops filed a lawsuit, citing copyright on the design from the brandbook.
Result: the court recognized the similarity as ambiguous, since the competitor did not literally copy the file, but 'reworked' the elements. It was not possible to prove copyright infringement — the expert examination did not confirm direct reproduction of the work. If the logo had been registered as a trademark, the case would have been decided differently: registration provides a presumption of ownership and protection from similarity up to the degree of confusion, not just from exact copying. This is the key difference between a 'beautiful document' and a legal tool.
Here entrepreneurs most often make mistakes. By default, exclusive rights to the design created by order belong to the performer — the designer or the agency — unless otherwise specified in the contract. Art. 1234 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation requires that the contract for the alienation of exclusive rights be concluded in writing. An oral agreement 'we paid, so everything is ours' has no legal significance.
If the contract does not contain a clause about transferring exclusive rights, the client only receives the right to use the brandbook within the framework of the contract, not full ownership. And what is important: without a clear chain of rights transfer from the designer to the client, it will be either impossible or disputable to register the logo as a trademark in one's own name — Rospatent and courts check who the actual owner of the designation is.
Developing a brandbook is only the first step, not the end of legal protection. Full protection is built in three stages.
Skipping the last step is the most common cause of problems. Without a registered trademark, it is impossible to conclude a franchise agreement (Article 1027 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation explicitly requires the franchisor to hold exclusive rights), it is difficult to pass marketplace checks — Wildberries and Ozon require proof of rights via a Rospatent certificate when registering a brand in their catalog. And the main risk is having your name seized by a competitor or a patent troll who registers it first and demands you stop using it, even though you came up with the brand.
A brandbook describes the brand, while a trademark protects it. These are not competing but complementary tools: without a brandbook, it is difficult to maintain visual language consistency, and without a trademark, it is impossible to defend those rights in court or stop copying. A reasonable sequence of actions is to first formalize rights to the created materials through a contract with the performer, then register key elements as trademarks, and only then use the brandbook as a working tool for the team and subcontractors.