Memes and brand: how to use internet humor without risking reputation
Why a meme is not just a joke, but a communication tool
A meme works not because it is funny by itself, but because it closes the distance between the brand and the person. 67% of consumers consider memes about advertising to be more honest than official messages — people are tired of polished formulations and prefer that version of the brand that can laugh at itself.
The Rollton case confirms this with numbers: engagement increased by 6481%, subscribers — by 1573%, content visibility reached 33% against a VK benchmark of 4%, that is 7,5 times higher. At the same time, the CTR of the narrow-targeted campaign was 3,12% versus the benchmark of 0,5%. The key condition for success — the memes were part of the strategy, not a one-time post for the sake of hype. A one-time joke is forgotten within a day, but a system of meme content forms a recognizable brand voice.
A good test for a meme's quality is the 'family approach': would a person want to forward this post to a colleague or parents without feeling awkward? If a joke requires a context-apology before being sent, it is made incorrectly.
Red lines: what you can never touch
There are topics where humor does not work regardless of execution — politics, religion, and acute social conflicts (abortions, wars, discrimination against minorities). The problem is not that the brand necessarily takes the wrong side — the problem is that it stands on one side in a topic where the audience already has irreconcilable camps. VkusVilla did not choose the 'wrong' position — it made a mistake by entering a topic where neutral reaction does not exist physically.
The second layer of risk is copyright, and it is more dangerous than it appears to marketers. Compensation for one case of using someone else's intellectual property object in Russia can amount from 10 thousand to 5 million rubles. Moreover, the larger the brand's audience, the higher the probability of a lawsuit — a large reach of publication makes the violation noticeable and attractive to the rights holder. The meme 'Zhduun' (The Waiter) brought a company to bankruptcy for using the image without permission. And the meme 'Natalya, Marine Corps' is actually registered as a trademark — its use for commercial purposes requires official coordination with the rights holder, not just a reference to the source.
| Risk category | What happens | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Social-political | The brand loses both sides of the conflict at the same time | VkusVilla |
| Copyright | Fine from 10 thousand to 5 million rubles for use | Zhduun, bankruptcy |
| Trademark | Official permission from the rights holder required | Natalya, Marine Corps |
Speed is more important than perfection: the lifecycle of a meme and the system of fast decisions
A meme lives for an average of about a month, and 60-70% of all reactions it gathers in the first 24 hours of existence. This means that the standard chain of approvals — marketer, manager, lawyer, brand manager — kills the meme even before publication. Approval even over the course of a day sharply reduces reach and makes the publication untimely: the audience has already moved on to the next joke.
The solution is not to cancel approval, but to compress it down to a single person authorized to make decisions right here and now. The working model:
- One employee (SMM editor or content lead) has the right to publish memes without approval from a manager, if the topic does not fall into the list of red lines.
- A pre-defined checklist of 3-4 items (no politics/religion, no copyright infringement on recognizable characters, fits the tone of voice) is checked in 10 minutes, not in a day.
- Legal review is only required for memes with an obvious character or registered trademark—everything else is published immediately.
Such a system may seem risky for companies with a classical hierarchy of approvals, but it is the only way to keep up with the trend rather than publish a meme when it has already become an anecdote about 'remember that meme'.
How to understand that a meme has run its course
A meme does not die suddenly—it goes through a saturation stage with recognizable symptoms. If a brand does not recognize them, the publication looks unwise rather than clever attempt to catch up with the train.
- Meta-jokes like 'this meme doesn't want to die' appear—audience laughs not at the format, but at the fact that it's dragging on.
- Instead of laughter, explanatory comments appear under posts—if a joke needs to be decoded, the moment is missed.
- The visibility of the post is still high, but there are almost no variations—the format is used literally without adaptation, indicating that ideas are exhausted.
- Direct comments like 'are we still doing this?'—the most obvious signal that the audience is tired before the brand.
A reasonable practice is to monitor not the meme itself, but the frequency of its appearance in the top of your feed over the last three days. If the format has disappeared from organic search but remains only in brand pages— the train has already left.
Check on your own: tone of voice and audience audit
Before publishing, one should ask not just one question 'is it funny or not', but three separate ones.
Does the meme match the brand's voice
If the brand traditionally speaks reservedly and professionally, sharp irony in the style of toxic publics will be perceived as a foreign mask rather than as an evolution of the voice. The test is simple: show the post to someone who doesn't work at the company and ask if they recognize the brand without the logo. If not — the meme is disconnected from the identity.
Will the target audience understand the joke, not just random subscribers
Niche memes (professional humor, narrow subcultural formats) work better than mass ones precisely because they do not dilute the audience — this is also confirmed by Rollton's targeting with a CTR six times higher than the benchmark. A wide meme for likes often attracts irrelevant audience who will not become a customer.
Won't the joke become ambiguous outside the brand context
A meme taken out of the feed and passed without a caption should remain neutral or positive. If when retelling to a third party the joke sounds like mockery of someone — this is a provocation on the edge, not humor.
Own meme or someone else's format — and what to do if something goes wrong
Creating original memes from scratch is an excessive task for most brands: the audience reacts not to originality but to speed and accuracy of hitting the current format. Adapting a ready trend is absolutely normal and working practice, if it does not reduce to copying without changes. The example of SlimJim is telling: the brand does not invent formats, but plays existing memes through its own mascot — thus recognizability is preserved even in the flow of foreign content, where dozens of brands post the same thing.
If a publication nevertheless triggers a negative reaction, signals of reputational damage are read quickly: the share of negative comments sharply exceeds the usual level, reposts with screenshots of 'look how the brand messed up' begin, engagement drops on subsequent posts — the audience demonstratively ignores the content. In this case, the correct response is not to secretly delete the post (this amplifies the scandal with screenshots of 'they deleted it, but we saved it'), but to publicly acknowledge the failure and apologize briefly, without excuses, within a few hours, not days. The speed of apologizing works on the same logic as the speed of posting a meme: both either keep up with the information cycle or lose meaning.
Why a meme is not just a joke, but a communication tool
A meme works not because it is funny by itself, but because it closes the distance between the brand and the person. 67% of consumers consider memes about advertising to be more honest than official messages — people are tired of polished formulations and prefer that version of the brand that can laugh at itself.
The Rollton case confirms this with numbers: engagement increased by 6481%, subscribers — by 1573%, content visibility reached 33% against a VK benchmark of 4%, that is 7,5 times higher. At the same time, the CTR of the narrow-targeted campaign was 3,12% versus the benchmark of 0,5%. The key condition for success — the memes were part of the strategy, not a one-time post for the sake of hype. A one-time joke is forgotten within a day, but a system of meme content forms a recognizable brand voice.
A good test for a meme's quality is the 'family approach': would a person want to forward this post to a colleague or parents without feeling awkward? If a joke requires a context-apology before being sent, it is made incorrectly.
Red lines: what you can never touch
There are topics where humor does not work regardless of execution — politics, religion, and acute social conflicts (abortions, wars, discrimination against minorities). The problem is not that the brand necessarily takes the wrong side — the problem is that it stands on one side in a topic where the audience already has irreconcilable camps. VkusVilla did not choose the 'wrong' position — it made a mistake by entering a topic where neutral reaction does not exist physically.
The second layer of risk is copyright, and it is more dangerous than it appears to marketers. Compensation for one case of using someone else's intellectual property object in Russia can amount from 10 thousand to 5 million rubles. Moreover, the larger the brand's audience, the higher the probability of a lawsuit — a large reach of publication makes the violation noticeable and attractive to the rights holder. The meme 'Zhduun' (The Waiter) brought a company to bankruptcy for using the image without permission. And the meme 'Natalya, Marine Corps' is actually registered as a trademark — its use for commercial purposes requires official coordination with the rights holder, not just a reference to the source.
| Risk category | What happens | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Social-political | The brand loses both sides of the conflict at the same time | VkusVilla |
| Copyright | Fine from 10 thousand to 5 million rubles for use | Zhduun, bankruptcy |
| Trademark | Official permission from the rights holder required | Natalya, Marine Corps |
Speed is more important than perfection: the lifecycle of a meme and the system of fast decisions
A meme lives for an average of about a month, and 60-70% of all reactions it gathers in the first 24 hours of existence. This means that the standard chain of approvals — marketer, manager, lawyer, brand manager — kills the meme even before publication. Approval even over the course of a day sharply reduces reach and makes the publication untimely: the audience has already moved on to the next joke.
The solution is not to cancel approval, but to compress it down to a single person authorized to make decisions right here and now. The working model:
- One employee (SMM editor or content lead) has the right to publish memes without approval from a manager, if the topic does not fall into the list of red lines.
- A pre-defined checklist of 3-4 items (no politics/religion, no copyright infringement on recognizable characters, fits the tone of voice) is checked in 10 minutes, not in a day.
- Legal review is only required for memes with an obvious character or registered trademark—everything else is published immediately.
Such a system may seem risky for companies with a classical hierarchy of approvals, but it is the only way to keep up with the trend rather than publish a meme when it has already become an anecdote about 'remember that meme'.
How to understand that a meme has run its course
A meme does not die suddenly—it goes through a saturation stage with recognizable symptoms. If a brand does not recognize them, the publication looks unwise rather than clever attempt to catch up with the train.
- Meta-jokes like 'this meme doesn't want to die' appear—audience laughs not at the format, but at the fact that it's dragging on.
- Instead of laughter, explanatory comments appear under posts—if a joke needs to be decoded, the moment is missed.
- The visibility of the post is still high, but there are almost no variations—the format is used literally without adaptation, indicating that ideas are exhausted.
- Direct comments like 'are we still doing this?'—the most obvious signal that the audience is tired before the brand.
A reasonable practice is to monitor not the meme itself, but the frequency of its appearance in the top of your feed over the last three days. If the format has disappeared from organic search but remains only in brand pages— the train has already left.
Check on your own: tone of voice and audience audit
Before publishing, one should ask not just one question 'is it funny or not', but three separate ones.
Does the meme match the brand's voice
If the brand traditionally speaks reservedly and professionally, sharp irony in the style of toxic publics will be perceived as a foreign mask rather than as an evolution of the voice. The test is simple: show the post to someone who doesn't work at the company and ask if they recognize the brand without the logo. If not — the meme is disconnected from the identity.
Will the target audience understand the joke, not just random subscribers
Niche memes (professional humor, narrow subcultural formats) work better than mass ones precisely because they do not dilute the audience — this is also confirmed by Rollton's targeting with a CTR six times higher than the benchmark. A wide meme for likes often attracts irrelevant audience who will not become a customer.
Won't the joke become ambiguous outside the brand context
A meme taken out of the feed and passed without a caption should remain neutral or positive. If when retelling to a third party the joke sounds like mockery of someone — this is a provocation on the edge, not humor.
Own meme or someone else's format — and what to do if something goes wrong
Creating original memes from scratch is an excessive task for most brands: the audience reacts not to originality but to speed and accuracy of hitting the current format. Adapting a ready trend is absolutely normal and working practice, if it does not reduce to copying without changes. The example of SlimJim is telling: the brand does not invent formats, but plays existing memes through its own mascot — thus recognizability is preserved even in the flow of foreign content, where dozens of brands post the same thing.
If a publication nevertheless triggers a negative reaction, signals of reputational damage are read quickly: the share of negative comments sharply exceeds the usual level, reposts with screenshots of 'look how the brand messed up' begin, engagement drops on subsequent posts — the audience demonstratively ignores the content. In this case, the correct response is not to secretly delete the post (this amplifies the scandal with screenshots of 'they deleted it, but we saved it'), but to publicly acknowledge the failure and apologize briefly, without excuses, within a few hours, not days. The speed of apologizing works on the same logic as the speed of posting a meme: both either keep up with the information cycle or lose meaning.
Recent articles
MegaFon, BMW, VTB and more 240+ companies. See how it looks in the showcase reel:
Our branding agency is approached to order:
Branding agency services
