Design agencies usually structure the brief around the brand, target audience, and competitors. This is necessary, but it is only half of the document. The second half is technical, and this is what is most often skipped. The difference in approach is simple: the creative part of the brief influences whether people will like the packaging. The technical part influences whether it will exist in physical form at all, without additional rounds of approval.
Based on the experience of large packaging manufacturers, including the Chinese giant Huamei, an incomplete description of the construction requires an average of 2-3 rounds of clarifications. Each round is a full cycle of correspondence across 12 time zones, meaning a real delay of up to two weeks. And this does not include the fact that some clarifications surface only after production launch, when it is no longer cheap to fix them.
Before discussing color and fonts, the manufacturer needs to know the physics of the product. Without this block, the packaging designer works blindly, and the material cost calculation becomes fantasy.
It is worth separately indicating the density and type of material — the grammage of cardboard in grams per square meter or thickness in millimeters. The absence of this figure in the brief can change the project cost by 20-30%: the manufacturer will either choose the material at their discretion and miscalculate the strength, or offer a more expensive option as a precaution. Packaging that has not been designed to withstand drops from a shelf and repeated customer handling in retail cannot physically withstand the retail cycle — it tears, deforms, and loses its product appearance before sale.
The word 'box' tells nothing to a design engineer. Specifics are needed at three levels: construction type, opening/closing mechanism, and assembly method.
If this block is described vaguely, the manufacturer sends a clarifying question — and the approval cycle starts over, with a delay of those very one and a half to two weeks.
The legal part of the brief often looks like a formality that is filled in at the last moment. In practice, this is a block whose error can halt the entire production run at the stage of passing customs or quality control.
| Parameter | What needs to be indicated in the brief |
|---|---|
| Sales countries | A specific list of markets — it determines the set of required labeling and certificates |
| Mandatory labeling | Composition, shelf life, barcode, country of origin, requirements of local standards (for example, GOST R 51074-2003 for Russia) |
| Certifications | FDA — for the US market, EAC — for EAEU countries, and others depending on the product category |
| Product category | Food, cosmetic, pharmaceutical — this determines the list of permitted materials and coatings |
It is worth separately noting the priority of information on the front panel. The consumer expects to see the product name, mass fraction of the key ingredient (for food products), and the expiration date or production date first. If priorities are not set in the brief, the designer will set them according to their own taste — and risks violating the local regulation requirement for readability of mandatory information.
Most briefs describe the front side in detail and almost say nothing about the back and side panels. This is one of the most frequent reasons for rework at the final stage, because the designer physically cannot 'guess' the content that was not in the assignment.
The rule is simple: the brief must include a full packaging layout with all panels, not just a facade visualization. Otherwise, the final layout will have to be assembled from missing fragments at the printing stage.
Even a perfectly described concept falls apart if the printer receives inaccurate technical data. These are the most expensive errors, because they surface during the proofing stage or the final print run.
A common mistake is sending a layout in CMYK without linking key brand colors to Pantone. On screen everything looks the same, but on different printing lines the color varies so much that the brand color ceases to be recognizable.
A separate block that rarely appears in template briefs is the sales channel. DTC packaging that is sent directly to the customer by mail can be easier and simpler in construction. Retail packaging must withstand repeated handling on shelves, drops, and pressure from adjacent products, therefore it requires a reinforced structure and denser material. Export packaging adds requirements for labeling and sometimes for resistance to prolonged transportation. If the sales channel is not specified in the brief, the manufacturer will offer an averaged solution that is either overpriced or not sturdy enough.
The same logic applies to product line extension. If the brief does not initially account for flavor or size options, the design concept may become a dead end: hot pepper on the packaging of hot sauce works, but the same visual system breaks down on ginger or classic variants of the line. Specifying future SKUs in the brief is not excessive foresight, but a way to avoid revisiting the entire concept six months after launching the first product.
Gathering all these parameters in one document is not bureaucracy, but a way to save real money and time. A complete brief addresses questions of construction, materials, regulations, and typographic specifications before the project goes into production, rather than after the first unsuccessful run.
Design agencies usually structure the brief around the brand, target audience, and competitors. This is necessary, but it is only half of the document. The second half is technical, and this is what is most often skipped. The difference in approach is simple: the creative part of the brief influences whether people will like the packaging. The technical part influences whether it will exist in physical form at all, without additional rounds of approval.
Based on the experience of large packaging manufacturers, including the Chinese giant Huamei, an incomplete description of the construction requires an average of 2-3 rounds of clarifications. Each round is a full cycle of correspondence across 12 time zones, meaning a real delay of up to two weeks. And this does not include the fact that some clarifications surface only after production launch, when it is no longer cheap to fix them.
Before discussing color and fonts, the manufacturer needs to know the physics of the product. Without this block, the packaging designer works blindly, and the material cost calculation becomes fantasy.
It is worth separately indicating the density and type of material — the grammage of cardboard in grams per square meter or thickness in millimeters. The absence of this figure in the brief can change the project cost by 20-30%: the manufacturer will either choose the material at their discretion and miscalculate the strength, or offer a more expensive option as a precaution. Packaging that has not been designed to withstand drops from a shelf and repeated customer handling in retail cannot physically withstand the retail cycle — it tears, deforms, and loses its product appearance before sale.
The word 'box' tells nothing to a design engineer. Specifics are needed at three levels: construction type, opening/closing mechanism, and assembly method.
If this block is described vaguely, the manufacturer sends a clarifying question — and the approval cycle starts over, with a delay of those very one and a half to two weeks.
The legal part of the brief often looks like a formality that is filled in at the last moment. In practice, this is a block whose error can halt the entire production run at the stage of passing customs or quality control.
| Parameter | What needs to be indicated in the brief |
|---|---|
| Sales countries | A specific list of markets — it determines the set of required labeling and certificates |
| Mandatory labeling | Composition, shelf life, barcode, country of origin, requirements of local standards (for example, GOST R 51074-2003 for Russia) |
| Certifications | FDA — for the US market, EAC — for EAEU countries, and others depending on the product category |
| Product category | Food, cosmetic, pharmaceutical — this determines the list of permitted materials and coatings |
It is worth separately noting the priority of information on the front panel. The consumer expects to see the product name, mass fraction of the key ingredient (for food products), and the expiration date or production date first. If priorities are not set in the brief, the designer will set them according to their own taste — and risks violating the local regulation requirement for readability of mandatory information.
Most briefs describe the front side in detail and almost say nothing about the back and side panels. This is one of the most frequent reasons for rework at the final stage, because the designer physically cannot 'guess' the content that was not in the assignment.
The rule is simple: the brief must include a full packaging layout with all panels, not just a facade visualization. Otherwise, the final layout will have to be assembled from missing fragments at the printing stage.
Even a perfectly described concept falls apart if the printer receives inaccurate technical data. These are the most expensive errors, because they surface during the proofing stage or the final print run.
A common mistake is sending a layout in CMYK without linking key brand colors to Pantone. On screen everything looks the same, but on different printing lines the color varies so much that the brand color ceases to be recognizable.
A separate block that rarely appears in template briefs is the sales channel. DTC packaging that is sent directly to the customer by mail can be easier and simpler in construction. Retail packaging must withstand repeated handling on shelves, drops, and pressure from adjacent products, therefore it requires a reinforced structure and denser material. Export packaging adds requirements for labeling and sometimes for resistance to prolonged transportation. If the sales channel is not specified in the brief, the manufacturer will offer an averaged solution that is either overpriced or not sturdy enough.
The same logic applies to product line extension. If the brief does not initially account for flavor or size options, the design concept may become a dead end: hot pepper on the packaging of hot sauce works, but the same visual system breaks down on ginger or classic variants of the line. Specifying future SKUs in the brief is not excessive foresight, but a way to avoid revisiting the entire concept six months after launching the first product.
Gathering all these parameters in one document is not bureaucracy, but a way to save real money and time. A complete brief addresses questions of construction, materials, regulations, and typographic specifications before the project goes into production, rather than after the first unsuccessful run.