Typical mistakes when creating slogans
‘We like it’ and ‘it works’ are not synonyms
Inside the team, the slogan is discussed by people who know too much about the product. A marketer hears a reference to the brand's history in the phrase, a designer hears a good rhyme, a manager hears a phrase that sounds beautiful at a presentation. The audience knows none of this and is not expected to decode the meanings embedded by the team. They see the text only once, without context, often on the run — in a feed, on a banner, in the noise of dozens of other messages.
‘We like it’ is an insider’s assessment, with the full brand context in mind. ‘It works’ is a measurable result: the slogan is correctly understood, evokes the right emotion, is remembered, and is associated specifically with this brand, not a competitor. The gap between these two assessments is the main reason why slogans that the company loves internally fail in the market. This is not resolved through arguments or a director’s taste, but through testing on a real target audience sample before launch, not after.
A slogan without positioning is a doomed slogan
Approximately 90% of businesses create a slogan detached from their positioning strategy: first they come up with a catchy phrase, then they look for justification for it. This is working backwards. A slogan is not a creative insight, but a condensed formulation of positioning, so before writing the text, you need to honestly answer three questions:
- For whom we are — who our buyer actually is, not 'everyone who is interested';
- What benefit we offer — what a person receives, not what the product can do;
- What our unique selling proposition is — why people choose us over a dozen similar alternatives.
Without answers to these questions, a copywriter works blindly and almost always compensates for the emptiness with beautiful but empty words — 'dream,' 'ideal,' 'exclusive,' 'prestige.' The list of hackneyed words in briefs of any copywriter is almost always the same: bliss, secret, taste, mystery, heavenly, flawless, unique, original, best, luxury. Each of these words appears in thousands of slogans at the same time — and precisely for this reason, none of them is remembered. The optimal length of a good slogan is 3–5 words; it must be readable and memorable at first glance, not after the third repetition on a banner.
Case: how Pepsi 'brought the dead back to life' in China
One of the most indicative failures in the history of slogans occurred in the 1960-ies, when Pepsi entered the Chinese market with the phrase 'Come Alive With the Pepsi Generation' — 'Come Alive With the Pepsi Generation.' The English metaphor of alertness, when directly translated into Chinese, turned into the statement 'Pepsi resurrects your ancestors from the dead.' For a market where the cult of ancestors and respect for the deceased is a fundamental cultural norm, this was not just an unfortunate joke, but a serious taboo violation. It took the company years to restore its reputation in the market.
It is telling that the mistake was not in the idea or in the strategy — the metaphor of 'revival' worked excellently on the English market. The mistake was that the phrase was not checked by native speakers and cultural experts before launch. Similar stories happened with other brands too:
| Brand | What happened | The reason for the failure |
|---|---|---|
| Electrolux | 'Nothing sucks like an Electrolux' was read on the American market as 'Nothing sucks like an Electrolux' | The word 'sucks' has changed its conversational meaning in American English |
| General Motors | The Chevrolet Nova model was not sold in Latin America | 'No va' in Spanish means 'does not go' |
| Parker Pen | The promise 'will not put you in an awkward position' was read differently in Mexico | Resemblance to a phrase meaning 'will not fertilize you' |
Localization errors: where meaning tears apart
All three stories above are united by one thing: the slogan worked in the language of the original and failed when transferred to another market. A literal translation is the most frequent and most dangerous error in localization, because it translates the literal meaning of words rather than the cultural and phonetic context in which they are heard. The second most frequent error is ignoring rhyming with profanity or indecent words in the market language; the third is ignorance of local taboos, whether it be the topic of death, religion, or physiology.
This can only be prevented by a systematic check, not by a translator's intuition:
- Linguistic verification by language speakers — not translators with degrees, but people who live in this linguistic environment and hear the colloquial meanings of words;
- Checking for rhymes with profanity and indecent expressions in the target language;
- Cultural audit — searching for taboo topics, symbols, and associations specific to the region;
- Legal verification — compliance with the market's advertising legislation;
- Focus test with representatives of the target audience before launching in media.
How to test a slogan, not guess in coffee grounds
Testing a slogan is not a matter of focus group taste — like/dislike, but measuring specific indicators. Practice shows working effectiveness thresholds:
- more than 60% of respondents correctly understand the meaning of the slogan without explanations;
- more than 70% associate the phrase specifically with this brand, not with a competitor;
- more than 50% perceive it as unique, not as a cliché from the category;
- the emotional response matches the intended one — the phrase does not evoke irritation, irony, or distrust where warmth or trust is needed.
If a slogan fails to pass at least one of these thresholds, it is refined before launch, not after complaints in social networks. This is cheaper than a reputational crisis, and cheaper than a repeated campaign launch. By the way, boring advertising returns an average of 4,48 dollar for every dollar invested, whereas non-boring and memorable advertising returns 5,21 dollars: the difference of a quarter in return on investment is explained precisely by the ability of the message to capture attention, not merely by the grammatical correctness of the text.
Can a slogan save a weak product?
No, and this should be said outright: a slogan is the packaging of meaning, not the meaning itself. If brand positioning is vague and the product does not deliver the claimed benefit, no formulation will close this gap for long — the market quickly compares the promise with the experience. A striking slogan in such a situation, at best, gives a short spike of interest, at worst, intensifies disappointment because it raises expectations above reality. A slogan that is not backed up by the product works like competitor advertising: it attracts a customer who then leaves and tells friends that the promise was not fulfilled.
A good slogan is a symptom of healthy positioning, not a tool that replaces it. If the phrase doesn't work out, doesn't sound right, or seems forced, the problem is usually not with the words or the copywriter's creativity, but that the brand itself still hasn't figured out for whom it exists and what it specifically differs from the neighbor on the shelf.
‘We like it’ is an insider’s assessment, with the full brand context in mind. ‘It works’ is a measurable result: the slogan is correctly understood, evokes the right emotion, is remembered, and is associated specifically with this brand, not a competitor. The gap between these two assessments is the main reason why slogans that the company loves internally fail in the market. This is not resolved through arguments or a director’s taste, but through testing on a real target audience sample before launch, not after.
A slogan without positioning is a doomed slogan
Approximately 90% of businesses create a slogan detached from their positioning strategy: first they come up with a catchy phrase, then they look for justification for it. This is working backwards. A slogan is not a creative insight, but a condensed formulation of positioning, so before writing the text, you need to honestly answer three questions:
- For whom we are — who our buyer actually is, not 'everyone who is interested';
- What benefit we offer — what a person receives, not what the product can do;
- What our unique selling proposition is — why people choose us over a dozen similar alternatives.
Without answers to these questions, a copywriter works blindly and almost always compensates for the emptiness with beautiful but empty words — 'dream,' 'ideal,' 'exclusive,' 'prestige.' The list of hackneyed words in briefs of any copywriter is almost always the same: bliss, secret, taste, mystery, heavenly, flawless, unique, original, best, luxury. Each of these words appears in thousands of slogans at the same time — and precisely for this reason, none of them is remembered. The optimal length of a good slogan is 3–5 words; it must be readable and memorable at first glance, not after the third repetition on a banner.
Case: how Pepsi 'brought the dead back to life' in China
One of the most indicative failures in the history of slogans occurred in the 1960-ies, when Pepsi entered the Chinese market with the phrase 'Come Alive With the Pepsi Generation' — 'Come Alive With the Pepsi Generation.' The English metaphor of alertness, when directly translated into Chinese, turned into the statement 'Pepsi resurrects your ancestors from the dead.' For a market where the cult of ancestors and respect for the deceased is a fundamental cultural norm, this was not just an unfortunate joke, but a serious taboo violation. It took the company years to restore its reputation in the market.
It is telling that the mistake was not in the idea or in the strategy — the metaphor of 'revival' worked excellently on the English market. The mistake was that the phrase was not checked by native speakers and cultural experts before launch. Similar stories happened with other brands too:
| Brand | What happened | The reason for the failure |
|---|---|---|
| Electrolux | 'Nothing sucks like an Electrolux' was read on the American market as 'Nothing sucks like an Electrolux' | The word 'sucks' has changed its conversational meaning in American English |
| General Motors | The Chevrolet Nova model was not sold in Latin America | 'No va' in Spanish means 'does not go' |
| Parker Pen | The promise 'will not put you in an awkward position' was read differently in Mexico | Resemblance to a phrase meaning 'will not fertilize you' |
Localization errors: where meaning tears apart
All three stories above are united by one thing: the slogan worked in the language of the original and failed when transferred to another market. A literal translation is the most frequent and most dangerous error in localization, because it translates the literal meaning of words rather than the cultural and phonetic context in which they are heard. The second most frequent error is ignoring rhyming with profanity or indecent words in the market language; the third is ignorance of local taboos, whether it be the topic of death, religion, or physiology.
This can only be prevented by a systematic check, not by a translator's intuition:
- Linguistic verification by language speakers — not translators with degrees, but people who live in this linguistic environment and hear the colloquial meanings of words;
- Checking for rhymes with profanity and indecent expressions in the target language;
- Cultural audit — searching for taboo topics, symbols, and associations specific to the region;
- Legal verification — compliance with the market's advertising legislation;
- Focus test with representatives of the target audience before launching in media.
How to test a slogan, not guess in coffee grounds
Testing a slogan is not a matter of focus group taste — like/dislike, but measuring specific indicators. Practice shows working effectiveness thresholds:
- more than 60% of respondents correctly understand the meaning of the slogan without explanations;
- more than 70% associate the phrase specifically with this brand, not with a competitor;
- more than 50% perceive it as unique, not as a cliché from the category;
- the emotional response matches the intended one — the phrase does not evoke irritation, irony, or distrust where warmth or trust is needed.
If a slogan fails to pass at least one of these thresholds, it is refined before launch, not after complaints in social networks. This is cheaper than a reputational crisis, and cheaper than a repeated campaign launch. By the way, boring advertising returns an average of 4,48 dollar for every dollar invested, whereas non-boring and memorable advertising returns 5,21 dollars: the difference of a quarter in return on investment is explained precisely by the ability of the message to capture attention, not merely by the grammatical correctness of the text.
Can a slogan save a weak product?
No, and this should be said outright: a slogan is the packaging of meaning, not the meaning itself. If brand positioning is vague and the product does not deliver the claimed benefit, no formulation will close this gap for long — the market quickly compares the promise with the experience. A striking slogan in such a situation, at best, gives a short spike of interest, at worst, intensifies disappointment because it raises expectations above reality. A slogan that is not backed up by the product works like competitor advertising: it attracts a customer who then leaves and tells friends that the promise was not fulfilled.
A good slogan is a symptom of healthy positioning, not a tool that replaces it. If the phrase doesn't work out, doesn't sound right, or seems forced, the problem is usually not with the words or the copywriter's creativity, but that the brand itself still hasn't figured out for whom it exists and what it specifically differs from the neighbor on the shelf.
Recent articles
MegaFon, BMW, VTB and more 240+ companies. See how it looks in the showcase reel:
Our branding agency is approached to order:
Branding agency services
