A slogan is a short advertising formula that conveys the brand's key promise outwardly, to the audience, and is repeated unchanged throughout the advertising campaign or for several years. A motto solves a different task: it describes the company's values to the company itself, for employees and partners, and is almost never intended for mass citation. Confusing these two tools is a common mistake in briefs: they write a motto as a slogan and are surprised that the phrase doesn't go beyond the corporate website.
Most slogans die with the media plan. For a phrase to take root in speech, it must meet several conditions at once — one or two are not enough.
The transition does not happen in one leap, but step by step, and at each stage the phrase slightly changes form and moves away from the original text.
«Snickersni» has reached the fifth stage: this word is used to describe a sudden change in mood from hunger even by those who remember the chocolate bar last.
| Slogan | Brand and year | How it is used now |
|---|---|---|
| «Don’t slow down — snickersni» | Snickers, 2010-th campaign | The verb «to snickersni» — a sudden change in mood due to hunger |
| «Just do it» | Nike, 1988, Wieden+Kennedy | A universal call to action in any area of life |
| «A diamond is forever» | De Beers, 1947, N.W. Ayer | A synonym for the idea of eternal value, used outside the jewelry theme |
| «There is contact» | MTS, beginning of 2000-s | A phrase borrowed from a historical statement made by cosmonaut Konstantin Feoktistov (1967), which was used in colloquial speech as confirmation of mutual understanding |
| «I'm lovin' it» | McDonald's, 2003 | A sarcastic remark about any everyday matter |
There is a risk that marketers speak about less often than they should: the stronger the slogan is detached from the company that created it, the less return the brand itself gets. If the phrase is used without a single thought about who came up with it, the entire communicative effect goes to the language, not the brand capital. This is close to the phenomenon of genericide — when a brand name becomes a designation for an entire product category, as happened with 'Xerox' and 'Jacuzzi'. The same risk with a slogan: it risks becoming a cliché instead of a company asset. A separate issue is legal. A phrase that has entered the free speech turnover loses its distinctive power as a trademark, and it becomes harder to protect it in court. Therefore, large brands, having achieved cultural penetration of the slogan, simultaneously strengthen their visual identity — logo, corporate color, font pair — in order to maintain the connection with the product at least at this level, when the phrase itself belongs to everyone.
Memorability and transition into language are different things, and confusing them is an error that is regularly made in briefs for copywriting. A melodic line can get stuck in someone's head for a week and then disappear without a trace: this works as advertising, but not as a linguistic asset. For a slogan to become part of speech, it needs not melodiousness, but functional universality — the ability to apply the phrase to a situation where the brand is not even mentioned. Therefore, agencies setting such a goal test slogans not with a memorability test in a focus group, but with a simple question: would a person utter this phrase on their own, in their own conversation, without prompts and without mentioning the product?
A slogan is a short advertising formula that conveys the brand's key promise outwardly, to the audience, and is repeated unchanged throughout the advertising campaign or for several years. A motto solves a different task: it describes the company's values to the company itself, for employees and partners, and is almost never intended for mass citation. Confusing these two tools is a common mistake in briefs: they write a motto as a slogan and are surprised that the phrase doesn't go beyond the corporate website.
Most slogans die with the media plan. For a phrase to take root in speech, it must meet several conditions at once — one or two are not enough.
The transition does not happen in one leap, but step by step, and at each stage the phrase slightly changes form and moves away from the original text.
«Snickersni» has reached the fifth stage: this word is used to describe a sudden change in mood from hunger even by those who remember the chocolate bar last.
| Slogan | Brand and year | How it is used now |
|---|---|---|
| «Don’t slow down — snickersni» | Snickers, 2010-th campaign | The verb «to snickersni» — a sudden change in mood due to hunger |
| «Just do it» | Nike, 1988, Wieden+Kennedy | A universal call to action in any area of life |
| «A diamond is forever» | De Beers, 1947, N.W. Ayer | A synonym for the idea of eternal value, used outside the jewelry theme |
| «There is contact» | MTS, beginning of 2000-s | A phrase borrowed from a historical statement made by cosmonaut Konstantin Feoktistov (1967), which was used in colloquial speech as confirmation of mutual understanding |
| «I'm lovin' it» | McDonald's, 2003 | A sarcastic remark about any everyday matter |
There is a risk that marketers speak about less often than they should: the stronger the slogan is detached from the company that created it, the less return the brand itself gets. If the phrase is used without a single thought about who came up with it, the entire communicative effect goes to the language, not the brand capital. This is close to the phenomenon of genericide — when a brand name becomes a designation for an entire product category, as happened with 'Xerox' and 'Jacuzzi'. The same risk with a slogan: it risks becoming a cliché instead of a company asset. A separate issue is legal. A phrase that has entered the free speech turnover loses its distinctive power as a trademark, and it becomes harder to protect it in court. Therefore, large brands, having achieved cultural penetration of the slogan, simultaneously strengthen their visual identity — logo, corporate color, font pair — in order to maintain the connection with the product at least at this level, when the phrase itself belongs to everyone.
Memorability and transition into language are different things, and confusing them is an error that is regularly made in briefs for copywriting. A melodic line can get stuck in someone's head for a week and then disappear without a trace: this works as advertising, but not as a linguistic asset. For a slogan to become part of speech, it needs not melodiousness, but functional universality — the ability to apply the phrase to a situation where the brand is not even mentioned. Therefore, agencies setting such a goal test slogans not with a memorability test in a focus group, but with a simple question: would a person utter this phrase on their own, in their own conversation, without prompts and without mentioning the product?