According to the study 'Ashmanov and Partners' (2022), 55% of online shoppers seek information about a product before every purchase — not just the first. Of these, 20% study the product from scratch, 18% compare options with each other, 15% check availability and current pricing. This means that the product card must simultaneously address three different tasks: educate newcomers, help those who are uncertain compare, and instantly confirm availability for those who have already decided and are just checking.
A separate story — repeat purchases. The Ashmanov study shows that for electronics and household appliances 55% of people check information before every purchase, and 75% are willing to re-analyze a product even when reordering the same category. The conclusion is simple: a description cannot work only for a 'cold' buyer — it must convince those who already know something about the category but want fresh arguments.
The card is read not entirely, but in layers, and at each layer a person asks themselves different questions.
If the product card only answers the first question with a beautiful headline, and then follows with a dry list of features without explaining "why I need this," the person leaves at the fourth step — the most expensive for the business, because he has already spent time reading.
The formulas AIDA and PAS are equally cited in all articles about product card copywriting, but they are applied differently depending on the category. Clothing is sold through image and tactile sensations, electronics — through numbers and risk reduction.
| Parameter | Clothing and accessories | Electronics and technology |
|---|---|---|
| Main trigger | Emotion, style, fit | Trust in specifications and compatibility |
| What determines the choice | Photo on model, reviews about size | Exact figures, comparison with similar models |
| Error in formulation | Technical language ("composition: 65% PE") | Vague adjectives ("powerful", "convenient") |
| Role of FAQ | Questions about size, fit, washing | Questions about compatibility, warranty, difference from the previous model |
| Optimal description length | Short, emotional, up to 3–4 blocks | Extended, with a feature table |
A common mistake made by clothing stores is copying the structure of technical product descriptions: dry bullet points without usage examples. Conversely, technical products often feature an excess of 'salesy' adjectives with a complete lack of specific numbers — and it is precisely numbers that reduce the risk of returns, because a person clearly understands what they are buying.
Not every trust signal is equally useful. An abstract 'quality guaranteed' does not convert, whereas a specific number or usage example converts almost always.
This is something that is almost never examined in detail, although the question-answer block solves two tasks at once. First, it converts doubters: a person who did not find an answer to a specific question in the main text more often leaves without purchasing, rather than writing to support. Second, structured Q&A is well read by AI search and voice assistants — the "question-short answer" format is convenient for extracting fragments in the search results.
The source of questions for FAQ is not the copywriter's imagination, but real customer questions in the "Questions about the product" section on Wildberries and Ozon, as well as questions from reviews of competitors in the same category. If five people in a row ask "is it suitable for dishwashers", this is a ready FAQ item that closes the objection before it arises in the next buyer.
There is no universal text for all marketplaces — platforms have different technical requirements and different ranking logic.
| Platform | Features | Where the key query works |
|---|---|---|
| Wildberries | Unique text without HTML and external links, limit 5000 characters | In the product name, description — secondary |
| Ozon | Support for HTML and Rich Content (video, tables, infographics) | In both the name and the description — detailed text works |
| Yandex Market | Strict compliance of the description with formalized characteristics | In the characteristics, the text must not contradict them |
From here comes a practical conclusion: for Ozon, it is worth investing in a detailed description with scripts and videos — it gives a noticeable boost in conversion, whereas for Wildberries, resources are better directed toward an accurate title and keywords within it, and the description itself should be compact and without unnecessary formatting that the platform will not tolerate.
Average conversion rate of product cards on marketplaces varies by category: for FMCG and essential goods — 4–7%, for electronics and appliances — 1–3%, overall across platforms — 2–3%, and the difference between the lower and upper boundaries is often explained by the structure of the text. Improving the structure of the product card can significantly improve conversion metrics: examples show an increase in add-to-cart by 14–28% depending on the category and type of optimization — due to text reconstruction, adding social proof, and improving the hierarchy of features.
The working sequence of blocks looks like this: brief positioning in up to three sentences — it determines whether to read further; then the main benefit in one phrase; followed by 3–5 key advantages in a list; detailed description with usage scenarios; feature table; FAQ block with real objections; and finally — purchase terms with a gentle call to action. This structure works for someone who just scans the card at a glance in three seconds (they catch the positioning and the list of advantages) and for someone who reads everything before making a serious purchase.
A good product card is not text for the sake of text, but a sequence of answers to real questions that a person asks themselves exactly in this product category and on this specific platform.
According to the study 'Ashmanov and Partners' (2022), 55% of online shoppers seek information about a product before every purchase — not just the first. Of these, 20% study the product from scratch, 18% compare options with each other, 15% check availability and current pricing. This means that the product card must simultaneously address three different tasks: educate newcomers, help those who are uncertain compare, and instantly confirm availability for those who have already decided and are just checking.
A separate story — repeat purchases. The Ashmanov study shows that for electronics and household appliances 55% of people check information before every purchase, and 75% are willing to re-analyze a product even when reordering the same category. The conclusion is simple: a description cannot work only for a 'cold' buyer — it must convince those who already know something about the category but want fresh arguments.
The card is read not entirely, but in layers, and at each layer a person asks themselves different questions.
If the product card only answers the first question with a beautiful headline, and then follows with a dry list of features without explaining "why I need this," the person leaves at the fourth step — the most expensive for the business, because he has already spent time reading.
The formulas AIDA and PAS are equally cited in all articles about product card copywriting, but they are applied differently depending on the category. Clothing is sold through image and tactile sensations, electronics — through numbers and risk reduction.
| Parameter | Clothing and accessories | Electronics and technology |
|---|---|---|
| Main trigger | Emotion, style, fit | Trust in specifications and compatibility |
| What determines the choice | Photo on model, reviews about size | Exact figures, comparison with similar models |
| Error in formulation | Technical language ("composition: 65% PE") | Vague adjectives ("powerful", "convenient") |
| Role of FAQ | Questions about size, fit, washing | Questions about compatibility, warranty, difference from the previous model |
| Optimal description length | Short, emotional, up to 3–4 blocks | Extended, with a feature table |
A common mistake made by clothing stores is copying the structure of technical product descriptions: dry bullet points without usage examples. Conversely, technical products often feature an excess of 'salesy' adjectives with a complete lack of specific numbers — and it is precisely numbers that reduce the risk of returns, because a person clearly understands what they are buying.
Not every trust signal is equally useful. An abstract 'quality guaranteed' does not convert, whereas a specific number or usage example converts almost always.
This is something that is almost never examined in detail, although the question-answer block solves two tasks at once. First, it converts doubters: a person who did not find an answer to a specific question in the main text more often leaves without purchasing, rather than writing to support. Second, structured Q&A is well read by AI search and voice assistants — the "question-short answer" format is convenient for extracting fragments in the search results.
The source of questions for FAQ is not the copywriter's imagination, but real customer questions in the "Questions about the product" section on Wildberries and Ozon, as well as questions from reviews of competitors in the same category. If five people in a row ask "is it suitable for dishwashers", this is a ready FAQ item that closes the objection before it arises in the next buyer.
There is no universal text for all marketplaces — platforms have different technical requirements and different ranking logic.
| Platform | Features | Where the key query works |
|---|---|---|
| Wildberries | Unique text without HTML and external links, limit 5000 characters | In the product name, description — secondary |
| Ozon | Support for HTML and Rich Content (video, tables, infographics) | In both the name and the description — detailed text works |
| Yandex Market | Strict compliance of the description with formalized characteristics | In the characteristics, the text must not contradict them |
From here comes a practical conclusion: for Ozon, it is worth investing in a detailed description with scripts and videos — it gives a noticeable boost in conversion, whereas for Wildberries, resources are better directed toward an accurate title and keywords within it, and the description itself should be compact and without unnecessary formatting that the platform will not tolerate.
Average conversion rate of product cards on marketplaces varies by category: for FMCG and essential goods — 4–7%, for electronics and appliances — 1–3%, overall across platforms — 2–3%, and the difference between the lower and upper boundaries is often explained by the structure of the text. Improving the structure of the product card can significantly improve conversion metrics: examples show an increase in add-to-cart by 14–28% depending on the category and type of optimization — due to text reconstruction, adding social proof, and improving the hierarchy of features.
The working sequence of blocks looks like this: brief positioning in up to three sentences — it determines whether to read further; then the main benefit in one phrase; followed by 3–5 key advantages in a list; detailed description with usage scenarios; feature table; FAQ block with real objections; and finally — purchase terms with a gentle call to action. This structure works for someone who just scans the card at a glance in three seconds (they catch the positioning and the list of advantages) and for someone who reads everything before making a serious purchase.
A good product card is not text for the sake of text, but a sequence of answers to real questions that a person asks themselves exactly in this product category and on this specific platform.