A written brief on these five pages saves more time than it appears: oral calls and voice messages almost always lead to additional questions and ambiguities in the task. Based on agency practice, a brief of 1-2 pages before starting work reduces the number of revisions by 30-50%—simply because all agreements are documented and can be referenced.
A vague goal is the most common problem with briefs, and it cannot be resolved with the phrase 'clarify the formulation'. The client almost always talks about recognizability, trust, or image — these are normal business goals, but they are not operationalizable for a single text. The task of the copywriter or project manager is to translate the abstract goal into a measurable formula.
A working goal is limited by three parameters: metric, volume, and timeframe. Not 'increase recognizability', but 'increase conversion from lead to application from 2% to 3,5% within a month at the current traffic volume'. Not 'make the text more sales-oriented', but 'reduce the bounce rate on the service page from 68% to 50%'. If the client cannot name the current figure — this is also a signal: perhaps the issue is not in the text, but in analytics, and the brief should start precisely with this question.
A portrait based on gender, age, and region is an error that migrates from brief to brief and makes the text equally useless for everyone. Such a description gives the copywriter nothing to rely on when choosing arguments and tone.
A working audience description is not built around 'who they are', but around 'what keeps them and what pushes them toward a decision'. For example: 'use Telegram as their main communication channel, fear wasting time in vain, want to get a ready-made solution without consultations and calls'. Such a formulation immediately sets the tone of the text — short phrases, specificity, minimum 'please contact us'.
There is no clear rule of 'only the client' or 'only the executor' — and this is a fundamentally different question than it appears at first glance. There are two working scenarios, and the choice between them depends on the client's readiness to formulate thoughts in writing.
The practical solution is a hybrid approach: the client is given a partially filled template, where some questions already have answer options (e.g., 'goal: sales growth / brand awareness / customer retention — select and specify the figure'). Such a template reduces the time needed to fill it out and guides the client on what to write, rather than leaving them alone with a blank page.
These are different documents with different authors, and confusing them is a typical reason for misunderstanding between the agency and the client. A brief describes the task from a business perspective, while a Terms of Reference describes it from an execution perspective.
| Parameter | Brief | Terms of Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Who writes | Client based on a template or copywriter based on the client's words | Copywriter (performer) |
| Volume | 1-2 pages | 10-20 pages |
| Content | Business goals, product, audience, tone | Text volume, keywords, density, structure, SEO requirements |
| When it is needed | Always before starting work on the text | When there are clear technical parameters (SEO articles, landing pages with structural requirements) |
If the project is simple and one-time — a short post, letter, or advertisement — sometimes the brief serves both functions, and a separate specification is not needed. If the text is substantial, with SEO requirements, or integrated into a marketing system with multiple executors, the brief and specification work together: the brief formulates 'why and for whom,' while the specification outlines 'how exactly technically.'
Most problems repeat from project to project, and almost all are resolved at the stage of creating the template, not during the process of working on the text.
A brief that actually works is not a checkbox form, but a tool for setting tasks with a measurable outcome. If after filling it out you cannot understand what would be considered success for the text, the document will have to be rewritten together with the text itself.
A written brief on these five pages saves more time than it appears: oral calls and voice messages almost always lead to additional questions and ambiguities in the task. Based on agency practice, a brief of 1-2 pages before starting work reduces the number of revisions by 30-50%—simply because all agreements are documented and can be referenced.
A vague goal is the most common problem with briefs, and it cannot be resolved with the phrase 'clarify the formulation'. The client almost always talks about recognizability, trust, or image — these are normal business goals, but they are not operationalizable for a single text. The task of the copywriter or project manager is to translate the abstract goal into a measurable formula.
A working goal is limited by three parameters: metric, volume, and timeframe. Not 'increase recognizability', but 'increase conversion from lead to application from 2% to 3,5% within a month at the current traffic volume'. Not 'make the text more sales-oriented', but 'reduce the bounce rate on the service page from 68% to 50%'. If the client cannot name the current figure — this is also a signal: perhaps the issue is not in the text, but in analytics, and the brief should start precisely with this question.
A portrait based on gender, age, and region is an error that migrates from brief to brief and makes the text equally useless for everyone. Such a description gives the copywriter nothing to rely on when choosing arguments and tone.
A working audience description is not built around 'who they are', but around 'what keeps them and what pushes them toward a decision'. For example: 'use Telegram as their main communication channel, fear wasting time in vain, want to get a ready-made solution without consultations and calls'. Such a formulation immediately sets the tone of the text — short phrases, specificity, minimum 'please contact us'.
There is no clear rule of 'only the client' or 'only the executor' — and this is a fundamentally different question than it appears at first glance. There are two working scenarios, and the choice between them depends on the client's readiness to formulate thoughts in writing.
The practical solution is a hybrid approach: the client is given a partially filled template, where some questions already have answer options (e.g., 'goal: sales growth / brand awareness / customer retention — select and specify the figure'). Such a template reduces the time needed to fill it out and guides the client on what to write, rather than leaving them alone with a blank page.
These are different documents with different authors, and confusing them is a typical reason for misunderstanding between the agency and the client. A brief describes the task from a business perspective, while a Terms of Reference describes it from an execution perspective.
| Parameter | Brief | Terms of Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Who writes | Client based on a template or copywriter based on the client's words | Copywriter (performer) |
| Volume | 1-2 pages | 10-20 pages |
| Content | Business goals, product, audience, tone | Text volume, keywords, density, structure, SEO requirements |
| When it is needed | Always before starting work on the text | When there are clear technical parameters (SEO articles, landing pages with structural requirements) |
If the project is simple and one-time — a short post, letter, or advertisement — sometimes the brief serves both functions, and a separate specification is not needed. If the text is substantial, with SEO requirements, or integrated into a marketing system with multiple executors, the brief and specification work together: the brief formulates 'why and for whom,' while the specification outlines 'how exactly technically.'
Most problems repeat from project to project, and almost all are resolved at the stage of creating the template, not during the process of working on the text.
A brief that actually works is not a checkbox form, but a tool for setting tasks with a measurable outcome. If after filling it out you cannot understand what would be considered success for the text, the document will have to be rewritten together with the text itself.