Trademark and nomenclature: how they are related
Linear approach versus parallel: where money is lost
Most companies still work in a chain of 'first we thought of it — then we checked it.' This is convenient organizationally: marketers don't get distracted by legal restrictions, and the creative process proceeds freely. The problem is that by the time of legal check, the name is already agreed upon with management, entered into the brief for design, sometimes even featured in announcements. A refusal from Rospatent at this stage is not just an unfortunate delay, but a complete reassembly of the corporate style, domains, and packaging.
| Parameter | Linear approach | Parallel approach |
|---|---|---|
| When the name is checked | After final selection | At the stage of shortlist from 10–15 options |
| What is checked | Only exact matches by name | Phonetics, visual, meaning, similar applications in the Nice Classification |
| Risk of refusal | High, discovered late | Filtered out until brand approval |
| Cost of error | Budget loss on design, packaging, domains | Minimal — rework at the level of idea lists |
Working model — preliminary legal filtering of each variant before marketers begin to 'fall in love' with it. This does not mean that the lawyer invents names. He simply eliminates obviously non-viable variants before resources and money are invested in them.
Criteria that should be in the naming brief from day one
The mistake in most briefs for naming is that only marketing requirements are specified: sound, associations with the product, and differentiation from competitors on the shelf. The legal layer is added later, if at all. A correct brief should immediately include:
- the absence of a direct description of the product or its properties (for example, 'Tasty milk' cannot be registered — this is an unprotectable descriptive element);
- the absence of phonetic, visual, and semantic similarity with already filed applications and registered marks in the relevant classes of the Nice Classification;
- a check for cross-cultural meanings, if the brand plans to expand beyond Russia;
- compliance with the norms of the Russian language and the absence of double, especially undesirable, interpretations;
- originality in the context not only of market competitors but also of any registered designations in general.
Rospatent will reject an application if a match is found in at least one of three factors — phonetic, visual, or semantic. One is enough. Therefore, checking 'by ear' and 'by eye' should be done in parallel, not instead of semantic analysis.
A free domain name guarantees nothing to a lawyer
This is where the most common misconception lies. The team checks the name in search, sees that the domain is free, and that the social media account is not taken — and concludes that the path is clear. But Rospatent does not search the internet. It compares the designation with the registry of registered trademarks and, more importantly, with the database of already filed applications that have not yet passed examination and are not visible in open search as 'taken.'
There is a paradox: a name can be completely fresh in Google and not appear anywhere among active brands — and yet be rejected because a competitor filed a similar application three months ago, about whom nobody knew. The only way to close this gap is to check against the database of submitted applications in specific Nice classes, not only the registry of registered marks. This is what a patent attorney or a specialized service does, but certainly not a browser search.
LLC «Vector» and the trademark VECTOR — different stories
Another widespread illusion: if a company is registered with the FNS as LLC «Parallel», then the name «Parallel» is already protected. This is not true. A firm name and a trademark are two separate legal objects that exist in different registries and serve different purposes.
| Parameter | Firm name | Trademark |
|---|---|---|
| Where it is registered | FNS at the time of legal entity creation | Rospatent, separate procedure |
| What It Protects | The legal entity name in the EGRUL registry | A designation of a product or service on the market |
| Geographic scope | By default — the whole Russia, but only as a legal entity name | The territory specified at registration (Russia, EAEU, international) |
| Can it be used in advertising, on packaging | Without a trademark — risk of a claim from the rights holder | Yes, this is its direct purpose |
Registering a legal entity under the name «Vector» does not give the right to use this word on packaging or in advertising as a brand — if someone else has already registered VECTOR as a trademark in your Nice Classification class, the claim would be justified, and the company name in EGRUL will not protect it.
Naming expertise — not a formality, but a separate tool
Naming expertise is often confused with a check for registrability, but these are two different stages. Expertise looks at the name more broadly — as a semantic object, not only as a legal unit. It is conducted in five directions:
- determining the precise meaning of the trademark and identifying hidden, including undesirable, meanings;
- checking compliance with the norms of the Russian language;
- assessing the originality against the background of the market;
- identifying similarities to the degree of confusion with existing and proposed designations;
- analyzing conflict-prone elements — things that may cause a negative reaction from the audience or regulator.
A classic case from global practice is Mitsubishi Pajero. The model name had to be changed in Spanish-speaking countries because the word has an obscene colloquial meaning there. Formally, the mark could have been registered, there were no legal obstacles — but the reputational risk was sufficient to rename the model. Expertise exists precisely for this purpose: to identify such things before launch, not after complaints on the market.
How much does it cost to register a trademark in 2024–2025 year
From 5 October 2024 year, the minimum cost of registering a trademark in one class of the Nice Classification is 35 000 rubles without issuing a paper certificate — this is almost twice the previous rate of 21 700 rubles. The increase is due to the revision of Rospatent fees, and it significantly affects the project's economics: whereas before one could include registration in the budget almost casually, now it is a separate expense requiring individual calculation, especially if the brand plans to register in several Nice Classification classes at once.
The amount includes fees for filing the application and conducting substantive examination — that is, the direct check for phonetic, visual, and semantic similarity, about which we spoke earlier. Patent attorney services, if engaged, are paid separately, and their work during the preliminary check is often cheaper than re-filing the application after a refusal with the already paid fees.
Linear approach versus parallel: where money is lost
Most companies still work in a chain of 'first we thought of it — then we checked it.' This is convenient organizationally: marketers don't get distracted by legal restrictions, and the creative process proceeds freely. The problem is that by the time of legal check, the name is already agreed upon with management, entered into the brief for design, sometimes even featured in announcements. A refusal from Rospatent at this stage is not just an unfortunate delay, but a complete reassembly of the corporate style, domains, and packaging.
| Parameter | Linear approach | Parallel approach |
|---|---|---|
| When the name is checked | After final selection | At the stage of shortlist from 10–15 options |
| What is checked | Only exact matches by name | Phonetics, visual, meaning, similar applications in the Nice Classification |
| Risk of refusal | High, discovered late | Filtered out until brand approval |
| Cost of error | Budget loss on design, packaging, domains | Minimal — rework at the level of idea lists |
Working model — preliminary legal filtering of each variant before marketers begin to 'fall in love' with it. This does not mean that the lawyer invents names. He simply eliminates obviously non-viable variants before resources and money are invested in them.
Criteria that should be in the naming brief from day one
The mistake in most briefs for naming is that only marketing requirements are specified: sound, associations with the product, and differentiation from competitors on the shelf. The legal layer is added later, if at all. A correct brief should immediately include:
- the absence of a direct description of the product or its properties (for example, 'Tasty milk' cannot be registered — this is an unprotectable descriptive element);
- the absence of phonetic, visual, and semantic similarity with already filed applications and registered marks in the relevant classes of the Nice Classification;
- a check for cross-cultural meanings, if the brand plans to expand beyond Russia;
- compliance with the norms of the Russian language and the absence of double, especially undesirable, interpretations;
- originality in the context not only of market competitors but also of any registered designations in general.
Rospatent will reject an application if a match is found in at least one of three factors — phonetic, visual, or semantic. One is enough. Therefore, checking 'by ear' and 'by eye' should be done in parallel, not instead of semantic analysis.
A free domain name guarantees nothing to a lawyer
This is where the most common misconception lies. The team checks the name in search, sees that the domain is free, and that the social media account is not taken — and concludes that the path is clear. But Rospatent does not search the internet. It compares the designation with the registry of registered trademarks and, more importantly, with the database of already filed applications that have not yet passed examination and are not visible in open search as 'taken.'
There is a paradox: a name can be completely fresh in Google and not appear anywhere among active brands — and yet be rejected because a competitor filed a similar application three months ago, about whom nobody knew. The only way to close this gap is to check against the database of submitted applications in specific Nice classes, not only the registry of registered marks. This is what a patent attorney or a specialized service does, but certainly not a browser search.
LLC «Vector» and the trademark VECTOR — different stories
Another widespread illusion: if a company is registered with the FNS as LLC «Parallel», then the name «Parallel» is already protected. This is not true. A firm name and a trademark are two separate legal objects that exist in different registries and serve different purposes.
| Parameter | Firm name | Trademark |
|---|---|---|
| Where it is registered | FNS at the time of legal entity creation | Rospatent, separate procedure |
| What It Protects | The legal entity name in the EGRUL registry | A designation of a product or service on the market |
| Geographic scope | By default — the whole Russia, but only as a legal entity name | The territory specified at registration (Russia, EAEU, international) |
| Can it be used in advertising, on packaging | Without a trademark — risk of a claim from the rights holder | Yes, this is its direct purpose |
Registering a legal entity under the name «Vector» does not give the right to use this word on packaging or in advertising as a brand — if someone else has already registered VECTOR as a trademark in your Nice Classification class, the claim would be justified, and the company name in EGRUL will not protect it.
Naming expertise — not a formality, but a separate tool
Naming expertise is often confused with a check for registrability, but these are two different stages. Expertise looks at the name more broadly — as a semantic object, not only as a legal unit. It is conducted in five directions:
- determining the precise meaning of the trademark and identifying hidden, including undesirable, meanings;
- checking compliance with the norms of the Russian language;
- assessing the originality against the background of the market;
- identifying similarities to the degree of confusion with existing and proposed designations;
- analyzing conflict-prone elements — things that may cause a negative reaction from the audience or regulator.
A classic case from global practice is Mitsubishi Pajero. The model name had to be changed in Spanish-speaking countries because the word has an obscene colloquial meaning there. Formally, the mark could have been registered, there were no legal obstacles — but the reputational risk was sufficient to rename the model. Expertise exists precisely for this purpose: to identify such things before launch, not after complaints on the market.
How much does it cost to register a trademark in 2024–2025 year
From 5 October 2024 year, the minimum cost of registering a trademark in one class of the Nice Classification is 35 000 rubles without issuing a paper certificate — this is almost twice the previous rate of 21 700 rubles. The increase is due to the revision of Rospatent fees, and it significantly affects the project's economics: whereas before one could include registration in the budget almost casually, now it is a separate expense requiring individual calculation, especially if the brand plans to register in several Nice Classification classes at once.
The amount includes fees for filing the application and conducting substantive examination — that is, the direct check for phonetic, visual, and semantic similarity, about which we spoke earlier. Patent attorney services, if engaged, are paid separately, and their work during the preliminary check is often cheaper than re-filing the application after a refusal with the already paid fees.
Recent articles
MegaFon, BMW, VTB and more 240+ companies. See how it looks in the showcase reel:
Our branding agency is approached to order:
Branding agency services
