Abstract (fantastical) brand names
Abstract, fantastical, arbitrary, descriptive — where does the boundary lie
Even professionals confuse these terms, and in Russian-language articles they are often used as synonyms. This is an error that hinders choosing the correct naming strategy.
| Type of name | Essence | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Descriptive | Directly names the product or its property | “Fast delivery”, General Motors |
| Associative (metaphorical) | An existing word with a metaphorical meaning | Amazon, Apple, Puma |
| Arbitrary | A real word that is not related to the product at all | Shell (oil, but the word means "shell") |
| Abstract (fantastical) | A made-up word that did not exist in the language before the brand was created | Kodak, Xerox, Rolex |
The boundary is simple: if the word can be found in a dictionary — it is an associative or arbitrary name. If it does not appear in any language before the brand is registered — it is abstract. Kodak means nothing in English or Swahili. Amazon means "river" — and this is a fundamentally different mechanism of how a name works.
Why abstract names cost more — and by how much exactly
A descriptive name works by itself from the first day: 'Aeroflot' is immediately understandable. An abstract name is an empty vessel that must be filled with meaning through advertising, PR, and repetition. Until Xerox became a synonym for copying, it was simply a sound word without a single association with paper.
In practice, this translates into specific budget items:
- increased media costs in the first year — need to explain to the market what lies behind the word;
- linguistic expertise to verify in all target languages;
- a longer recognition period — usually 2-3 years versus several months for descriptive names;
- the risk that the word will not be remembered on first contact — contact will have to be repeated more frequently.
For a startup with a limited budget, this is critical. If there are no funds for a long-term campaign to 'introduce' the meaning, an abstract name may remain an empty sound longer than the company's reserve of strength allows. Hence the rule: abstraction is justified where there is a resource for a long game, or where the product itself is so new that a descriptive name will not work anyway.
Phonetics and linguistics: how to build a sound that works everywhere
George Eastman did not choose the letter K twice for Kodak by accident — he considered it a decisive, clear consonant that is pronounced the same way in most languages of the world. Hans Wilsdorf, creating Rolex, followed the same path: a short word, easy to pronounce, without semantic load that can then be filled in independently.
Companies use a set of proven linguistic techniques, not intuition:
- Alliteration — repetition of consonants at the beginning of syllables: Coca-Cola, PayPal. Such names are easier to remember and pronounce rhythmically.
- Assonance — repetition of vowel sounds: Tesla, Lululemon. Creates melody without formal rhyme.
- Open syllables — the word ends in a vowel: Nike, Adidas, Sony. Such words are easier to adapt to different languages and do not stumble on unfamiliar consonant combinations.
A separate stage is checking for negative associations. The story of Pepsi in China is a classic: the slogan in a literal translation sounded like 'bring ancestors from the grave,' and the formulation had to be changed. For an abstract name, such a check is mandatory precisely because the word has no 'natural' meaning — it can easily accidentally coincide with something inappropriate or frightening in another language.
Curiosity as a marketing asset
There is a counterintuitive fact that rarely appears in articles about naming: a study by IE Business School showed that Kickstarter projects with abstract (non-semantic) names raised on average 17,1% more funding than projects with semantic, understandable names.
The mechanics are simple — an incomprehensible word makes the brain pause and figure out what it means. A descriptive name closes the question immediately, while an abstract one opens it. This is visible in Google by the query pattern: for abstract technological brands, people tend to ask 'what does this name mean,' whereas for descriptive or associative names, they ask 'what does this company do.' The first type of question is exactly that curiosity hook a brand can use to its advantage if it's ready to tell the story of its name.
Adidas and false legends: why you shouldn't invent meaning in advance
Adidas is not an acronym or a metaphor, although there is a legend about 'All Day I Dream About Sport.' In reality, it's a blend of the nickname Adi (from Adolf) and the first three letters of the surname Dassler. The meaning came later, invented by consumers themselves — and this is an excellent illustrative example of how an abstract name over time grows its own mythology without the brand's involvement.
Conclusion for practice: there's no need to embed a hidden decryption in an abstract name and then explain it. A meaningless word works better if the brand has the patience to wait for the market to come up with a legend or fill it with meaning through the product.
When an abstract name wins and when it loses to a descriptive one
The choice depends not on taste, but on the industry and planning horizon.
- Technologies and startups with ambitions for the global market — an abstract name removes the problem of translation and cultural associations (example of the approach used by Kodak and Rolex).
- Daily demand products with a short decision-making cycle — descriptive or associative names work better here, because buyers are not ready to spend time on 'decoding'.
- Luxury brands and watchmakers — abstraction plus flawless phonetics create a sense of exclusivity, like Rolex.
- B2B-segment with a long sales cycle — here, descriptiveness is sometimes more important than originality, because the decision is made by a committee that needs clarity from the first slide of the presentation.
General rule: an abstract name works where a company has the time and budget to explain to the market what it means. Where decisions are made in seconds on the store shelf, betting on a blank word may not pay off at all.
Abstract, fantastical, arbitrary, descriptive — where does the boundary lie
Even professionals confuse these terms, and in Russian-language articles they are often used as synonyms. This is an error that hinders choosing the correct naming strategy.
| Type of name | Essence | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Descriptive | Directly names the product or its property | “Fast delivery”, General Motors |
| Associative (metaphorical) | An existing word with a metaphorical meaning | Amazon, Apple, Puma |
| Arbitrary | A real word that is not related to the product at all | Shell (oil, but the word means "shell") |
| Abstract (fantastical) | A made-up word that did not exist in the language before the brand was created | Kodak, Xerox, Rolex |
The boundary is simple: if the word can be found in a dictionary — it is an associative or arbitrary name. If it does not appear in any language before the brand is registered — it is abstract. Kodak means nothing in English or Swahili. Amazon means "river" — and this is a fundamentally different mechanism of how a name works.
Why abstract names cost more — and by how much exactly
A descriptive name works by itself from the first day: 'Aeroflot' is immediately understandable. An abstract name is an empty vessel that must be filled with meaning through advertising, PR, and repetition. Until Xerox became a synonym for copying, it was simply a sound word without a single association with paper.
In practice, this translates into specific budget items:
- increased media costs in the first year — need to explain to the market what lies behind the word;
- linguistic expertise to verify in all target languages;
- a longer recognition period — usually 2-3 years versus several months for descriptive names;
- the risk that the word will not be remembered on first contact — contact will have to be repeated more frequently.
For a startup with a limited budget, this is critical. If there are no funds for a long-term campaign to 'introduce' the meaning, an abstract name may remain an empty sound longer than the company's reserve of strength allows. Hence the rule: abstraction is justified where there is a resource for a long game, or where the product itself is so new that a descriptive name will not work anyway.
Phonetics and linguistics: how to build a sound that works everywhere
George Eastman did not choose the letter K twice for Kodak by accident — he considered it a decisive, clear consonant that is pronounced the same way in most languages of the world. Hans Wilsdorf, creating Rolex, followed the same path: a short word, easy to pronounce, without semantic load that can then be filled in independently.
Companies use a set of proven linguistic techniques, not intuition:
- Alliteration — repetition of consonants at the beginning of syllables: Coca-Cola, PayPal. Such names are easier to remember and pronounce rhythmically.
- Assonance — repetition of vowel sounds: Tesla, Lululemon. Creates melody without formal rhyme.
- Open syllables — the word ends in a vowel: Nike, Adidas, Sony. Such words are easier to adapt to different languages and do not stumble on unfamiliar consonant combinations.
A separate stage is checking for negative associations. The story of Pepsi in China is a classic: the slogan in a literal translation sounded like 'bring ancestors from the grave,' and the formulation had to be changed. For an abstract name, such a check is mandatory precisely because the word has no 'natural' meaning — it can easily accidentally coincide with something inappropriate or frightening in another language.
Curiosity as a marketing asset
There is a counterintuitive fact that rarely appears in articles about naming: a study by IE Business School showed that Kickstarter projects with abstract (non-semantic) names raised on average 17,1% more funding than projects with semantic, understandable names.
The mechanics are simple — an incomprehensible word makes the brain pause and figure out what it means. A descriptive name closes the question immediately, while an abstract one opens it. This is visible in Google by the query pattern: for abstract technological brands, people tend to ask 'what does this name mean,' whereas for descriptive or associative names, they ask 'what does this company do.' The first type of question is exactly that curiosity hook a brand can use to its advantage if it's ready to tell the story of its name.
Adidas and false legends: why you shouldn't invent meaning in advance
Adidas is not an acronym or a metaphor, although there is a legend about 'All Day I Dream About Sport.' In reality, it's a blend of the nickname Adi (from Adolf) and the first three letters of the surname Dassler. The meaning came later, invented by consumers themselves — and this is an excellent illustrative example of how an abstract name over time grows its own mythology without the brand's involvement.
Conclusion for practice: there's no need to embed a hidden decryption in an abstract name and then explain it. A meaningless word works better if the brand has the patience to wait for the market to come up with a legend or fill it with meaning through the product.
When an abstract name wins and when it loses to a descriptive one
The choice depends not on taste, but on the industry and planning horizon.
- Technologies and startups with ambitions for the global market — an abstract name removes the problem of translation and cultural associations (example of the approach used by Kodak and Rolex).
- Daily demand products with a short decision-making cycle — descriptive or associative names work better here, because buyers are not ready to spend time on 'decoding'.
- Luxury brands and watchmakers — abstraction plus flawless phonetics create a sense of exclusivity, like Rolex.
- B2B-segment with a long sales cycle — here, descriptiveness is sometimes more important than originality, because the decision is made by a committee that needs clarity from the first slide of the presentation.
General rule: an abstract name works where a company has the time and budget to explain to the market what it means. Where decisions are made in seconds on the store shelf, betting on a blank word may not pay off at all.
Recent articles
MegaFon, BMW, VTB and more 240+ companies. See how it looks in the showcase reel:
Our branding agency is approached to order:
Branding agency services
