eNPS (employee loyalty index) as an HR brand metric
Why eNPS does not replace an engagement survey
eNPS answers one question: is the employee willing to recommend the company as a place of work. Employee Engagement Survey includes dozens of items about management, recognition, work-life balance, team relations, and working conditions. eNPS shows the temperature, but does not explain the diagnosis. If the index drops from +20 to -5, you will know that something is wrong, but you will not know what exactly: salaries, a toxic department head, or the cancellation of a flexible schedule.
That is why Bain & Company, the authors of the methodology, recommend not limiting oneself to one question on loyalty, but adding a second metric — 'My job inspires me' (my job inspires me). The first question better predicts retention, the second gives a forecast based on the team's creative potential and energy. These are two different dimensions, and replacing the entire Engagement Survey with them is an error that companies making attempts to save on research commit.
Does eNPS correlate with employee turnover
Yes, the link exists, and it is confirmed by practice: the question about recommending the company as an employer turned out to be the best predictor of retention among all the formulations that were tested by Bain & Company. But the link is not linear and not immediate. A low eNPS today does not mean mass dismissals in a week — it is rather a leading indicator that manifests itself over the horizon of several months.
A telling case: a financial company with 5000+ employees conducted quarterly surveys from 2017 to 2020 year and discovered that loyalty varies significantly depending on the person's status — candidate, newcomer, working specialist, or departing employee. This means that the averaged eNPS across the entire company masks a problem at a specific stage of Employee Journey. It is precisely at this stage — the transition from 'working' to 'departed' — that the decline in the index often heralds actual attrition.
How to calculate eNPS and what is considered a good result
The formula is standard: the share of promoters minus the share of critics. Employees are divided into three groups according to a scale from 0 to 10:
- Promoters (9-10 points) — loyal, willing to recommend
- Neutral (7-8 points) — satisfied but not ready to actively advise
- Critics (0-6 points) — dissatisfied, may harm the employer's reputation
Example from practice: out of 1892 surveyed employees, 374 became promoters (19,7%), 1054 were neutral, 464 were critics (24,5%). Final eNPS = 19,7 - 24,5 = -4,8%. A negative result directly signals a systemic issue, not random deviations. A benchmark for a 'good' indicator is +30 and above, but more important than the absolute number is its movement relative to your own measurement history.
eNPS in the context of other HR metrics
eNPS does not work in isolation — its meaning becomes clear only in the context of other indicators. It is important to distinguish between three similar but different indices.
| Metric | What it measures |
|---|---|
| eNPS | Employee loyalty to the company as an employer |
| Internal NPS | Employee loyalty as a consumer of internal services (IT, HR, AH&O) |
| Classic NPS | Loyalty of external clients to a product or service |
To strengthen the HR brand, eNPS needs to be compared with turnover, retention rate, and the share of employee referrals to candidates (referral rate). If eNPS is growing while turnover remains high — the problem is not in the overall atmosphere, but in a specific group (for example, new hires are leaving specifically in the first three months). Google and Apple use eNPS as a regular instrument precisely to respond to changes in sentiment faster than these changes are reflected in the numbers of resignations and employer reviews in open sources.
Why a one-time measurement is useless
The annual eNPS survey shows a photograph, not a film. The recommended frequency is monthly, which is the most common rhythm among companies seriously working with the indicator; quarterly measurements are the minimum acceptable option. Regularity allows you to see not the absolute value, but the trend: a decline of 10 points per quarter is more important than the fact that the final number formally remained 'in the green zone'.
Correct interpretation of the dynamics is based on comparing with events in the company: leadership changes, reorganization, salary delays, launch of a new motivation system. eNPS without context becomes a number for the sake of a number. Therefore, the survey should be supplemented with 4-5 open-ended questions — this is enough to stay within 5-10 minutes and not lose the qualitative context that explains why the number changed.
What to do with the results and how to measure the effect
Measurement without action devalues the metric in the eyes of employees — people quickly stop answering honestly if they see that surveys change nothing. A working action algorithm:
- Segment the results by stages of Employee Journey — candidate, newcomer (first 90 days), current employee, resigned — because the reasons for dissatisfaction at each stage are different
- Identify 2-3 specific areas with the greatest decline based on open-ended questions, rather than trying to 'improve everything at once'
- Assign responsibility for each area and a deadline — for example, a department head, not abstractly 'HR department'
- Conduct a follow-up measurement after one or two cycles (month or quarter) specifically for this segment
- Comparing the change in eNPS with the change in turnover and referral rate within the same group — that is the measurement of real effect, not self-comfort from a pretty number
The main mistake of most companies is to consider eNPS a final report, rather than a working tool for diagnostics. The metric is valuable exactly to the extent that managerial decisions are made based on it and the effect of those decisions is repeatedly verified
Why eNPS does not replace an engagement survey
eNPS answers one question: is the employee willing to recommend the company as a place of work. Employee Engagement Survey includes dozens of items about management, recognition, work-life balance, team relations, and working conditions. eNPS shows the temperature, but does not explain the diagnosis. If the index drops from +20 to -5, you will know that something is wrong, but you will not know what exactly: salaries, a toxic department head, or the cancellation of a flexible schedule.
That is why Bain & Company, the authors of the methodology, recommend not limiting oneself to one question on loyalty, but adding a second metric — 'My job inspires me' (my job inspires me). The first question better predicts retention, the second gives a forecast based on the team's creative potential and energy. These are two different dimensions, and replacing the entire Engagement Survey with them is an error that companies making attempts to save on research commit.
Does eNPS correlate with employee turnover
Yes, the link exists, and it is confirmed by practice: the question about recommending the company as an employer turned out to be the best predictor of retention among all the formulations that were tested by Bain & Company. But the link is not linear and not immediate. A low eNPS today does not mean mass dismissals in a week — it is rather a leading indicator that manifests itself over the horizon of several months.
A telling case: a financial company with 5000+ employees conducted quarterly surveys from 2017 to 2020 year and discovered that loyalty varies significantly depending on the person's status — candidate, newcomer, working specialist, or departing employee. This means that the averaged eNPS across the entire company masks a problem at a specific stage of Employee Journey. It is precisely at this stage — the transition from 'working' to 'departed' — that the decline in the index often heralds actual attrition.
How to calculate eNPS and what is considered a good result
The formula is standard: the share of promoters minus the share of critics. Employees are divided into three groups according to a scale from 0 to 10:
- Promoters (9-10 points) — loyal, willing to recommend
- Neutral (7-8 points) — satisfied but not ready to actively advise
- Critics (0-6 points) — dissatisfied, may harm the employer's reputation
Example from practice: out of 1892 surveyed employees, 374 became promoters (19,7%), 1054 were neutral, 464 were critics (24,5%). Final eNPS = 19,7 - 24,5 = -4,8%. A negative result directly signals a systemic issue, not random deviations. A benchmark for a 'good' indicator is +30 and above, but more important than the absolute number is its movement relative to your own measurement history.
eNPS in the context of other HR metrics
eNPS does not work in isolation — its meaning becomes clear only in the context of other indicators. It is important to distinguish between three similar but different indices.
| Metric | What it measures |
|---|---|
| eNPS | Employee loyalty to the company as an employer |
| Internal NPS | Employee loyalty as a consumer of internal services (IT, HR, AH&O) |
| Classic NPS | Loyalty of external clients to a product or service |
To strengthen the HR brand, eNPS needs to be compared with turnover, retention rate, and the share of employee referrals to candidates (referral rate). If eNPS is growing while turnover remains high — the problem is not in the overall atmosphere, but in a specific group (for example, new hires are leaving specifically in the first three months). Google and Apple use eNPS as a regular instrument precisely to respond to changes in sentiment faster than these changes are reflected in the numbers of resignations and employer reviews in open sources.
Why a one-time measurement is useless
The annual eNPS survey shows a photograph, not a film. The recommended frequency is monthly, which is the most common rhythm among companies seriously working with the indicator; quarterly measurements are the minimum acceptable option. Regularity allows you to see not the absolute value, but the trend: a decline of 10 points per quarter is more important than the fact that the final number formally remained 'in the green zone'.
Correct interpretation of the dynamics is based on comparing with events in the company: leadership changes, reorganization, salary delays, launch of a new motivation system. eNPS without context becomes a number for the sake of a number. Therefore, the survey should be supplemented with 4-5 open-ended questions — this is enough to stay within 5-10 minutes and not lose the qualitative context that explains why the number changed.
What to do with the results and how to measure the effect
Measurement without action devalues the metric in the eyes of employees — people quickly stop answering honestly if they see that surveys change nothing. A working action algorithm:
- Segment the results by stages of Employee Journey — candidate, newcomer (first 90 days), current employee, resigned — because the reasons for dissatisfaction at each stage are different
- Identify 2-3 specific areas with the greatest decline based on open-ended questions, rather than trying to 'improve everything at once'
- Assign responsibility for each area and a deadline — for example, a department head, not abstractly 'HR department'
- Conduct a follow-up measurement after one or two cycles (month or quarter) specifically for this segment
- Comparing the change in eNPS with the change in turnover and referral rate within the same group — that is the measurement of real effect, not self-comfort from a pretty number
The main mistake of most companies is to consider eNPS a final report, rather than a working tool for diagnostics. The metric is valuable exactly to the extent that managerial decisions are made based on it and the effect of those decisions is repeatedly verified
Recent articles
MegaFon, BMW, VTB and more 240+ companies. See how it looks in the showcase reel:
Our branding agency is approached to order:
Branding agency services
