The correct order is to start with meanings, then form. First, positioning, values, communication tone, target audience, and competitive field are established — what is called the brand platform. Only after that does it make sense to draw a logo and select colors, because visual solutions should express an already formulated idea, not replace it.
If you skip the strategic stage, you get exactly the situation described in the introduction: a beautiful but meaningless document. The designer doesn't know why a particular font was chosen, the marketing department cannot explain the brand's 'voice' to clients, and a new employee, opening the brand book, sees rules for logo placement on business cards but nothing about why the company exists at all or how it should communicate with its audience. A visual style without a platform is packaging without content.
These three documents are often confused, but they solve different tasks and cost different amounts.
| Document | What's inside | Who it suits |
|---|---|---|
| Logobook | Logo usage rules: protective field, minimum size, prohibited distortions, versions on colored and black backgrounds | Small business, startups, companies without a dedicated marketing department |
| Guidelines | Logo + palette, fonts, graphic elements, patterns, layout of media — but without a deep strategic part | Medium-sized companies, where there is already an external contractor or designer in the staff |
| Full brand book | Brand platform, positioning, tone of voice, visual system, rules for application on all media | Companies with multiple departments, franchises, brands with ambitions for scaling |
A telling contrast: in Russian Railways, the brand style guide occupies more than 160 pages — there are dozens of types of transport, staff uniforms, and station navigation. At 'The Crossroads,' the logo usage rules fit into 20 pages — the network does not require the level of detail found in railway documentation. The document's scale is determined not by ambition, but by the actual complexity of the business.
Before opening a graphic editor, one must finalize the technical specification. Without it, the designer works by guesswork, and the client receives what is 'pretty' but not what is needed.
Before launching, the following must be ready:
An often-skipped step is interviewing the team. It's worth talking not only with the leadership but also with sales, support, and HR: they each day broadcast the brand outward and know where current rules (if any) are not working. Good questions for such an interview: 'What do customers say about us most often?', 'What phrase would you never say on behalf of the company?', 'Which competitor irritates you most and why?' The answers provide more material for the brand platform than any brief.
And before including the logo in the final document, it must be checked for registrability: over 90% of trademark applications at Rospatent are rejected due to similarity with already registered marks. It's cheaper to check this at the start than to redo the brand book after a refusal to register.
The duration of such work in Russia is from 3 to 8 weeks, and the cost depends heavily on the volume: the basic version costs 150 000–700 000 ₽, a comprehensive project with a strategy and a branched system of carriers can cost from 2 million ₽ and up.
Design is almost never the main reason here. The document is abandoned for other reasons.
A brandbook is not a memory document, but a working tool, and it should be treated as a product that develops together with the company. It is worth reviewing it entirely once every 2-3 years or when there are noticeable changes — rebranding, entering a new market, launching a new direction. Point updates — new carriers, updated templates — are more logical to introduce as they appear, not waiting for a major review.
Format matters no less than content. Static PDF is good for legal fixation of rules, but does not live well in daily team work: it is difficult to update, versions diverge, designers edit local copies. Working practice — to maintain an up-to-date version in Figma or a similar system with access rights, where changes are visible to everyone at once, and generate PDF as a 'snapshot' for external contractors or partners. Thus the document remains a living tool, not an archival file that is opened once when signing a contract with a design studio.
If you plan to assign the project to an agency, please check the stages and components of brandbook development in Gromov Branding: the service page collects the work process, examples of documents, and a form for discussing the task.