The mistake is almost always the same — the client pays for the work, receives the files, but does not receive the rights. By default, the exclusive right to the created object remains with the author unless otherwise specified in the contract. Article 1296 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation explicitly requires a written form for transferring rights to the results of intellectual activity — an oral agreement or correspondence in a messenger does not have legal force.
To obtain full control over the logo, guidelines, and other visual elements, the contract must stipulate:
If the designer is a staff member, instead of an author contract, a service character assignment and an act must be used to confirm that the logo was created within the scope of employment duties. Otherwise, even a staff designer formally remains the author.
Comprehensive protection works only with the correct sequence of actions — registration of a trademark without a complete documental trail of authorship often leads to disputes over priority.
A trademark is valid for 10 years with the possibility of unlimited renewal — this is the longest-lasting tool, but also the slowest to obtain. Copyright works faster: it arises automatically upon creation of the work and is valid for 70 years after the author's death without any registration. Therefore, depositing the brand platform should be done before filing a trademark application, not after — this provides a document that can be presented immediately, without waiting for months of examination.
Registering individual elements — the logo as a trademark, the name as a designation — leaves the system itself unprotected: the color ratio, compositional principles, tone of communication, structure of value delivery. Copying this system without directly touching the logo is quite possible, and formally this does not constitute a violation of the rights to the registered mark.
Art. 1259 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation recognizes the brandbook and the guideline as objects of copyright as composite works — registration for this is not required, the right arises automatically. But without depositing, it is almost impossible to prove the date of creation and authorship in court: a competitor will always be able to claim that they copied exactly from him. Deposit not only fixes the mere fact of the document's existence, but also its exact content on a specific date — this is ready evidence, not an argument 'on the word'.
Registering a color as a trademark is difficult, but not impossible. PAO Sberbank succeeded in registering a green color, proving its distinctive capability through an analysis of intensive commercial use — on the website, ATMs, employees' uniforms, and in branch interiors — and confirmed this with the results of sociological surveys on recognizability. Such a path works only with large-scale and long-term use of the color as a recognizable element of the brand.
If there are no resources for such a campaign, the mechanism of protection from unfair competition has been in effect since 2015 year. The corporate identity as a whole, including the color palette, is protected without mandatory registration, if it is possible to prove its distinctive capability and priority of use. For this, the following are needed:
The first step is not a claim, but the fixation of the violation: screenshots of the competitor's website, photos of products, advertisements with dates, preferably through a notarial protocol of site inspection. Then there are three parallel paths, and it is reasonable to use them together, not separately.
| Grounds for protection | What needs to be proven | Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Copyright infringement | The date of creation of the brandbook/logo, authorship, the fact of copying | Works without registration, if there is depositing |
| Trademark infringement | Similarity to the degree of confusion, class of goods/services | Fast compensation recovery in court |
| Unfair competition | Priority of using style, distinctive capability, reputation damage | Covers elements not registered as marks |
In court, the side that has gathered evidence in advance wins, not post facto. That is why depositing the brand platform and having a well-drafted contract with a designer is not a mere formality, but a foundation upon which all other protection methods rest.
In practice, one tool is rarely enough. A trademark covers the name and logo in specific product classes, copyright protects the brand platform document and graphics, a design patent covers packaging and physical carriers of the style, a company name and commercial designation cover legal identification of the company, and the provision on unfair competition covers everything that is formally not registered but recognizable. A reasonable strategy is not to choose one method, but to include a combination in the budget: immediate deposit, trademark registration in the first year of the brand's operation, and additional applications as individual elements gain recognition.