Rebranding in HoReCa: restaurants and cafes
Where to start: step-by-step rebranding plan
Rebranding a restaurant or cafe is not just changing a logo over the weekend, but a managed project with clear stages. Skipping any of them increases the risk of failure and unnecessary expenses.
- Audit of the current state. Analysis of brand recognition, reviews, unit economics of points, condition of premises and contracts with suppliers.
- Determining the reason for rebranding. Declining traffic, changing target audience, legal requirement to change the name, company merger — the reason determines the depth of changes.
- Developing a new brand platform. Positioning, naming, visual code, tone of communication.
- Pilot launch on 1–3 points. Testing hypotheses before scaling across the entire network — an obligatory stage often skipped for the sake of speed.
- Legal preparation. Trademark registration, review of lease and supply contracts, updating alcohol and trading licenses.
- Scaling and PR campaign. Synchronized launch at all locations with informational support for both existing and new customers.
- Measuring results. Traffic, average check, number of checks, brand recognition — minimum after 3–6 months from launch.
How much does rebranding cost and where does the money go
Estimated cost of rebranding the space — $300–500 per square meter, which in total amounts to 30–50% of the cost of the space itself. The entire process, from audit to full launch, takes 6–12 months. The budget is distributed across several categories, and savings in any of them usually end up being more expensive in the long run.
| Expense item | Budget share | What is included |
|---|---|---|
| Brand design and strategy | 10–15% | Naming, logo, brand identity, guidelines |
| Store renovation and decoration | 40–55% | Interior, signage, furniture, navigation |
| Legal support | 5–10% | Registration of trademarks, reissuance of licenses and contracts |
| PR and communications | 15–20% | Launch, working with media, social networks |
| Staff training | 5–10% | New service standards, scripts, forms |
Rebranding a network: how not to turn an update into chaos at 200 locations
This is the gap that almost no one writes about. One thing is to update one restaurant, and quite another is to synchronize changes across dozens or hundreds of locations, each with its own lease agreement, its own sign contractor, and its own schedule. For «Kroshka Kartoshka» with more than 200 locations, rebranding required not only a unified visual language but also logistics: a sequence of equipment replacement, a schedule for updating signs, staff training in waves, not all at once.
The practical conclusion is simple: networks need not just one launch plan, but a matrix of priority locations. First, flagship locations with high foot traffic are updated — they form the new brand perception faster. Then come locations with expiring leases, where renovation is inevitable anyway. Last come locations in stable rent without obvious issues, where it is possible to stretch the schedule without losing revenue.
Legal pitfalls: trademarks, licenses, and contracts with suppliers
Changing a name is not only a new sign, but a complete review of the legal perimeter of the business. A telling example is the «Yo» network (formerly «Yo-bi-do-yo»), which underwent rebranding by court order: the co-owner had to file new trademark registration applications separately for sushi, rolls, noodles, and training services — each product and service category requires its own application at Rospatent.
When changing the brand, several mandatory legal steps must be taken:
- Check and register the new trademark in all classes of the Nice Agreement that the business uses — from food to culinary courses.
- Reregister the alcohol sales license — it is tied to the legal entity and address, but the name in the documents must match the actual one.
- Review contracts with suppliers, where the old name often appears and packaging brand standards are specified.
- Notify landlords of the name change — in most contracts, this is a direct obligation of the tenant.
The case of «Vkusno i Tochka» shows a competent approach to the transition: the network renamed some dishes — «Big Special» instead of «Big Taste», «Ice De Luxe» instead of «MacFlurry» — while preserving the recognizability of main positions, but not all classic dishes were returned to their original form. This reduced the legal risks related to intellectual property of the former franchiser and at the same time preserved the product's recognizability for guests.
How not to lose old guests during a name change
A radical brand change always scares part of the audience — people attach themselves not to the logo, but to the feeling of the place. The coffee shops «Kofiy», having rebranded to «Utrorniy keks», consciously preserved the interior of the network from 6 points — and more than half of the positive reviews after rebranding were specifically about comfort, that is, about what did not change.
«Matryoshkino» went a different way — there the rebranding was accompanied by a clear strengthening of service and menu, and the result was measurable: traffic increased by 40%, the number of bills at one of the points — by 92%, and the average bill across all points rose by 57%. This proves that retaining loyalty does not contradict attracting new customers, if the changes affect the real experience, not just the facade.
Working tactic — transition period with dual branding: the old name is large, the new one is nearby, with a gradual inversion of proportions over 2–3 months. Plus direct communication with regular guests via SMS, social networks and staff — people should learn about the brand change not from the signboard, but in advance.
Rebranding, restyling and reconceptualization: what is the difference
Confusion between these terms is the source of half the errors in projects. The difference is not in the scale of the budget, but in the depth of changes.
| Concept | What changes | When it is applied |
|---|---|---|
| Restyling | Visual update of the logo, colors, signs without changing the positioning | The brand is visually outdated but still works and is recognizable |
| Rebranding | Name, visual code, positioning, sometimes target audience | Change of owner, legal requirement, reputation crisis, entering a new market |
| Reconceptualization | Establishment format, menu, price segment, atmosphere — while keeping the name | The format is outdated, but the name retains value and recognizability |
Restyling is needed when the brand has visually declined, but guests have no complaints about the essence. Rebranding is justified when the old name hinders growth or it is legally impossible to retain it, as in the case of «Society E». Recomposition is the choice for those who want to refresh the format without risking to lose the recognition of the name accumulated over the years.
Mistakes that kill rebranding
- Launching across the entire network at once, without a pilot — mistakes scale up to all locations simultaneously.
- Ignoring contracts and licenses before starting visual changes — this risks fines and legal disputes.
- Complete silence before old guests — a sudden change without warning is perceived as the disappearance of a beloved place, not its evolution.
- Cutting corners on staff training — the new concept is not conveyed by the signboard, but by a specific person behind the counter.
- Lack of metrics before launch — without measuring traffic and the «before» checkout, it is impossible to prove the effectiveness of rebranding «after».
Where to start: step-by-step rebranding plan
Rebranding a restaurant or cafe is not just changing a logo over the weekend, but a managed project with clear stages. Skipping any of them increases the risk of failure and unnecessary expenses.
- Audit of the current state. Analysis of brand recognition, reviews, unit economics of points, condition of premises and contracts with suppliers.
- Determining the reason for rebranding. Declining traffic, changing target audience, legal requirement to change the name, company merger — the reason determines the depth of changes.
- Developing a new brand platform. Positioning, naming, visual code, tone of communication.
- Pilot launch on 1–3 points. Testing hypotheses before scaling across the entire network — an obligatory stage often skipped for the sake of speed.
- Legal preparation. Trademark registration, review of lease and supply contracts, updating alcohol and trading licenses.
- Scaling and PR campaign. Synchronized launch at all locations with informational support for both existing and new customers.
- Measuring results. Traffic, average check, number of checks, brand recognition — minimum after 3–6 months from launch.
How much does rebranding cost and where does the money go
Estimated cost of rebranding the space — $300–500 per square meter, which in total amounts to 30–50% of the cost of the space itself. The entire process, from audit to full launch, takes 6–12 months. The budget is distributed across several categories, and savings in any of them usually end up being more expensive in the long run.
| Expense item | Budget share | What is included |
|---|---|---|
| Brand design and strategy | 10–15% | Naming, logo, brand identity, guidelines |
| Store renovation and decoration | 40–55% | Interior, signage, furniture, navigation |
| Legal support | 5–10% | Registration of trademarks, reissuance of licenses and contracts |
| PR and communications | 15–20% | Launch, working with media, social networks |
| Staff training | 5–10% | New service standards, scripts, forms |
Rebranding a network: how not to turn an update into chaos at 200 locations
This is the gap that almost no one writes about. One thing is to update one restaurant, and quite another is to synchronize changes across dozens or hundreds of locations, each with its own lease agreement, its own sign contractor, and its own schedule. For «Kroshka Kartoshka» with more than 200 locations, rebranding required not only a unified visual language but also logistics: a sequence of equipment replacement, a schedule for updating signs, staff training in waves, not all at once.
The practical conclusion is simple: networks need not just one launch plan, but a matrix of priority locations. First, flagship locations with high foot traffic are updated — they form the new brand perception faster. Then come locations with expiring leases, where renovation is inevitable anyway. Last come locations in stable rent without obvious issues, where it is possible to stretch the schedule without losing revenue.
Legal pitfalls: trademarks, licenses, and contracts with suppliers
Changing a name is not only a new sign, but a complete review of the legal perimeter of the business. A telling example is the «Yo» network (formerly «Yo-bi-do-yo»), which underwent rebranding by court order: the co-owner had to file new trademark registration applications separately for sushi, rolls, noodles, and training services — each product and service category requires its own application at Rospatent.
When changing the brand, several mandatory legal steps must be taken:
- Check and register the new trademark in all classes of the Nice Agreement that the business uses — from food to culinary courses.
- Reregister the alcohol sales license — it is tied to the legal entity and address, but the name in the documents must match the actual one.
- Review contracts with suppliers, where the old name often appears and packaging brand standards are specified.
- Notify landlords of the name change — in most contracts, this is a direct obligation of the tenant.
The case of «Vkusno i Tochka» shows a competent approach to the transition: the network renamed some dishes — «Big Special» instead of «Big Taste», «Ice De Luxe» instead of «MacFlurry» — while preserving the recognizability of main positions, but not all classic dishes were returned to their original form. This reduced the legal risks related to intellectual property of the former franchiser and at the same time preserved the product's recognizability for guests.
How not to lose old guests during a name change
A radical brand change always scares part of the audience — people attach themselves not to the logo, but to the feeling of the place. The coffee shops «Kofiy», having rebranded to «Utrorniy keks», consciously preserved the interior of the network from 6 points — and more than half of the positive reviews after rebranding were specifically about comfort, that is, about what did not change.
«Matryoshkino» went a different way — there the rebranding was accompanied by a clear strengthening of service and menu, and the result was measurable: traffic increased by 40%, the number of bills at one of the points — by 92%, and the average bill across all points rose by 57%. This proves that retaining loyalty does not contradict attracting new customers, if the changes affect the real experience, not just the facade.
Working tactic — transition period with dual branding: the old name is large, the new one is nearby, with a gradual inversion of proportions over 2–3 months. Plus direct communication with regular guests via SMS, social networks and staff — people should learn about the brand change not from the signboard, but in advance.
Rebranding, restyling and reconceptualization: what is the difference
Confusion between these terms is the source of half the errors in projects. The difference is not in the scale of the budget, but in the depth of changes.
| Concept | What changes | When it is applied |
|---|---|---|
| Restyling | Visual update of the logo, colors, signs without changing the positioning | The brand is visually outdated but still works and is recognizable |
| Rebranding | Name, visual code, positioning, sometimes target audience | Change of owner, legal requirement, reputation crisis, entering a new market |
| Reconceptualization | Establishment format, menu, price segment, atmosphere — while keeping the name | The format is outdated, but the name retains value and recognizability |
Restyling is needed when the brand has visually declined, but guests have no complaints about the essence. Rebranding is justified when the old name hinders growth or it is legally impossible to retain it, as in the case of «Society E». Recomposition is the choice for those who want to refresh the format without risking to lose the recognition of the name accumulated over the years.
Mistakes that kill rebranding
- Launching across the entire network at once, without a pilot — mistakes scale up to all locations simultaneously.
- Ignoring contracts and licenses before starting visual changes — this risks fines and legal disputes.
- Complete silence before old guests — a sudden change without warning is perceived as the disappearance of a beloved place, not its evolution.
- Cutting corners on staff training — the new concept is not conveyed by the signboard, but by a specific person behind the counter.
- Lack of metrics before launch — without measuring traffic and the «before» checkout, it is impossible to prove the effectiveness of rebranding «after».
Recent articles
MegaFon, BMW, VTB and more 240+ companies. See how it looks in the showcase reel:
Our branding agency is approached to order:
Branding agency services
