A client comes to an agency with the words 'we need naming' and often means the entire brand as a whole — logo, colors, strategy. The confusion between these concepts occurs almost as frequently as the confusion between brand and logo.
Branding is the entire process of creating a brand: research, strategy, positioning, visual identity and communication. Naming is one of the stages of this process, specifically responsible for the verbal part — the name and, sometimes, the slogan.
In a properly structured process, naming follows the development of strategy and positioning, rather than preceding them. A name created before the essence of the brand is defined risks not matching the positioning that will be formed later.
In practice, both orders occur: sometimes a fortunate name itself suggests the direction of positioning, but this is more of an exception than a rule, and relying on such luck is risky for serious business.
Formally, yes — it is possible to come up with a name without developing a full brand strategy, and many small businesses do just that at the start. But this approach carries a risk: the name may turn out to be a lucky sound, but may not correspond to the actual positioning that the company will form later, which will require either a rebranding or adjusting the strategy to fit the existing word.
Established branding agencies usually conduct naming and the rest of the branding simultaneously within a single project, synchronizing the teams of strategists, linguists, and designers. This helps avoid the situation where visual identity is developed for one name, and then lawyers find a conflict and force a name change, breaking the already completed design.
Ordering naming separately from the rest of the branding, it is important to clearly formulate a brief with a description of the positioning and brand values — even if a formal strategy does not yet exist. Without this foundation, naming turns into a creative experiment in the dark, the result of which may not meet the actual business tasks.
A useful metaphor for briefing the client: if the brand is a house, then naming is the nameplate on the door. The nameplate is important and noticeable first, but it does not replace the foundation, the walls, and what happens inside the house.
Most professional studios structure the process this way: first, a strategic session and formulation of positioning, then parallel streams of naming and visual development, and finally — combining all elements into a unified, coordinated brandbook.
Understanding this difference also helps to more accurately formulate the technical specification when contacting an agency — clarifying whether naming is needed specifically or a full branding project — this saves time for both parties right from the start of negotiations.
A client comes to an agency with the words 'we need naming' and often means the entire brand as a whole — logo, colors, strategy. The confusion between these concepts occurs almost as frequently as the confusion between brand and logo.
Branding is the entire process of creating a brand: research, strategy, positioning, visual identity and communication. Naming is one of the stages of this process, specifically responsible for the verbal part — the name and, sometimes, the slogan.
In a properly structured process, naming follows the development of strategy and positioning, rather than preceding them. A name created before the essence of the brand is defined risks not matching the positioning that will be formed later.
In practice, both orders occur: sometimes a fortunate name itself suggests the direction of positioning, but this is more of an exception than a rule, and relying on such luck is risky for serious business.
Formally, yes — it is possible to come up with a name without developing a full brand strategy, and many small businesses do just that at the start. But this approach carries a risk: the name may turn out to be a lucky sound, but may not correspond to the actual positioning that the company will form later, which will require either a rebranding or adjusting the strategy to fit the existing word.
Established branding agencies usually conduct naming and the rest of the branding simultaneously within a single project, synchronizing the teams of strategists, linguists, and designers. This helps avoid the situation where visual identity is developed for one name, and then lawyers find a conflict and force a name change, breaking the already completed design.
Ordering naming separately from the rest of the branding, it is important to clearly formulate a brief with a description of the positioning and brand values — even if a formal strategy does not yet exist. Without this foundation, naming turns into a creative experiment in the dark, the result of which may not meet the actual business tasks.
A useful metaphor for briefing the client: if the brand is a house, then naming is the nameplate on the door. The nameplate is important and noticeable first, but it does not replace the foundation, the walls, and what happens inside the house.
Most professional studios structure the process this way: first, a strategic session and formulation of positioning, then parallel streams of naming and visual development, and finally — combining all elements into a unified, coordinated brandbook.
Understanding this difference also helps to more accurately formulate the technical specification when contacting an agency — clarifying whether naming is needed specifically or a full branding project — this saves time for both parties right from the start of negotiations.